<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-65022</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-65022</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>julien breval</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hello</p>
<p>I programmed a few wave shaper and wave folder modules for my digital modular synthesizer. Because these modules can add lots of harmonics, they all use oversampling (implemented with poly~). They all work, except the most simple one.</p>
<p>See the attached ZIP file:<br />
1. download the ZIP file<br />
2. extract the ZIP file<br />
3. open &#8220;test_power_shaper~.maxpat&#8221; in Max<br />
4. see the instructions in the patch</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the problem?</p>
<p>Surprisingly, some other shapers I programmed use several pow~ objects and work normally (when tested one by one)</p>
<p>Tested with Max 6.0.7 on Windows 7 64-bit</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234459</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234459</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Patrick Delges</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>It does work if you set <strong>poly~</strong>&#8216;s <em>resampling</em> attribute to 0.</p>
<p>This reminds me this old topic:<br />
<a href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic.php?id=36397#post-176724" rel="nofollow">http://cycling74.com/forums/topic.php?id=36397#post-176724</a><br />
and after one year, it doesn&#8217;t sound to have been corrected&#8230;</p>
<p>p</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234460</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234460</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>julien breval</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Thanks for your answer Patrick</p>
<p>But when the resampling attribute is set to zero, there are no more resampling filters. As far as I understand, these filters are anti-aliasing filters, though this is not clearly stated in the manual. I am using oversampling ONLY for reducing the aliasing when the synthesis introduces some frequencies that are higher than sample_rate/2, so turning these filters off is not really possible. Or do I have to program my own anti-aliasing filter, as you do in Pure Data? In this case, which kind of filter is recommended?</p>
<p>About the problem you mentioned with groove~, I confirm it still does not work either :(</p>
<p>To complicate things, I had some other problems with oversampling in Max (still when using poly~), but I don&#8217;t really want to post them immediately because it may confuse things a lot.</p>
<p>Seriously, removing aliasing can improve the sound a lot, and in some cases, I don&#8217;t know how to reduce aliasing besides &#8220;hardcore&#8221; oversampling and anti-aliasing filters.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234461</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234461</link>
					<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>julien breval</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Just a precision</p>
<p>From a musical result&#8217;s point of view, something is missing in the shaper I posted: the input signal (from -1 to 1) should be scaled between 0 and 1 before the shaper processing, and re-scaled between -1 and 1 after the shaper.</p>
<p>But this does not correct the problem</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234462</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234462</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>julien breval</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>still no serious answer about this</p>
<p>and as I said I found other problems related to oversampling</p>
<p>makes me think it&#8217;s actually not possible to use oversampling in Max :(</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234463</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Problem when using pow~ with oversampling]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/problem-when-using-pow-with-oversampling/#post-234463</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>pid</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>did you report this to cycling74 bug reporting?</p>
<p>because to me it seems like a weird pow~ bug. all my other up/down antialiasing sampling works perfectly, but i cannot get your examples to work at all, just as you say.</p>
<p>no idea what it could be.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

