Forums > MaxMSP

problem with phasor~ OR cycle~ lookup

March 24, 2007 | 4:07 pm


March 24, 2007 | 4:17 pm



grg
March 24, 2007 | 4:43 pm

Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:
> i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to
> switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer
> how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase
> with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the
> volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the
> cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.

Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).


March 24, 2007 | 7:01 pm

*facepalm*

thanks Georg!

-jonathan

On 3/24/07, Georg Bosch wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:
> > i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to
> > switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer
> > how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase
> > with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the
> > volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the
> > cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.
>
> Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).
>
>


March 26, 2007 | 9:47 pm

jonathan lee marcus schrieb:
> (phasor~ only accepts floats).

Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase
signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a
signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all… ;-)


Stefan Tiedje————x——-
–_____———–|————–
–(_|_ —-|—–|—–()——-
– _|_)—-|—–()————–
———-()——–www.ccmix.com


March 26, 2007 | 10:27 pm

ah yes! to further clarify, i’m not constantly changing the phase, only
occasionally but smoothly with a line~. i have two phasor~s, one 16 times as
fast as the other. i could’ve used one phasor~ and a rate~ except that i
wanted to change the relative phase/offset in time between the two phasor~s.

i’ll probably post it sometime soon. i’ve been having other issues which i
would love feedback on. that and i think it’s high time i start sharing more
of my patches…

best,
jonathan

On 3/26/07, Stefan Tiedje wrote:
>
> jonathan lee marcus schrieb:
> > (phasor~ only accepts floats).
>
> Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase
> signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a
> signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all… ;-)
>
> –
> Stefan Tiedje————x——-
> –_____———–|————–
> –(_|_ —-|—–|—–()——-
> — _|_)—-|—–()————–
> ———-()——–www.ccmix.com
>
>


Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)