jonathan.marcus

problem-with-phasor-or-cycle-lookup

Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:

> i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to 

> switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer 

> how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase 

> with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the 

> volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the 

> cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.

Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).

Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:
> i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to 
> switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer 
> how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase 
> with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the 
> volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the 
> cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.

Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).


> Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:

> > i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to

> > switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer

> > how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase

> > with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the

> > volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the

> > cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.

> Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).

On 3/24/07, Georg Bosch  wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.03.2007 um 17:07 schrieb jonathan lee marcus:
> > i have a playback engine driven by a phasor~ but i would like to
> > switch to using a cycle~ with a sawtooth wavetable because i prefer
> > how cycle~ deals with phase and that it allows me to control phase
> > with a signal (phasor~ only accepts floats). my problem is with the
> > volume ducking patch. for some reason, when i switch to using the
> > cycle~, i get some erroneous data which causes a click.
>
> Write one more sample (i.e. uzi 513, counter 0 512, / 512).
>
>

Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase 

signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a 

signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all... ;-)

jonathan lee marcus schrieb:
> (phasor~ only accepts floats). 

Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase 
signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a 
signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all... ;-)

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


ah yes! to further clarify, i'm not constantly changing the phase, only

occasionally but smoothly with a line~. i have two phasor~s, one 16 times as

fast as the other. i could've used one phasor~ and a rate~ except that i

wanted to change the relative phase/offset in time between the two phasor~s.

i'll probably post it sometime soon. i've been having other issues which i

would love feedback on. that and i think it's high time i start sharing more

> Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase

> signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a

> signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all... ;-)

ah yes! to further clarify, i'm not constantly changing the phase, only
occasionally but smoothly with a line~. i have two phasor~s, one 16 times as
fast as the other. i could've used one phasor~ and a rate~ except that i
wanted to change the relative phase/offset in time between the two phasor~s.

i'll probably post it sometime soon. i've been having other issues which i
would love feedback on. that and i think it's high time i start sharing more
of my patches...

On 3/26/07, Stefan Tiedje  wrote:
>
> jonathan lee marcus schrieb:
> > (phasor~ only accepts floats).
>
> Which makes sense, as the phase of a phasor would just be the phase
> signal itself (If you want to control the phase of phasor~ with a
> signal, just connect the phase directly, no phasor~ needed at all... ;-)
>
> --
> Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
> --_____-----------|--------------
> --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
> -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
> ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
>
>

problem with phasor~ OR cycle~ lookup