MikEyhaTsis

In the documentation, quickthresh.help it says 

"The total latency will only ever be the base thresh time -or- the base thresh time plus the thresh extension. This makes it feel more responsive than thresh in a live performance situation."

Does the "Fudge" argument add any latency to a patch? for instance , if i make a patch that uses a quickthresh obj, with :

In the documentation, quickthresh.help it says 
 "The total latency will only ever be the base thresh time -or- the base thresh time plus the thresh extension. This makes it feel more responsive than thresh in a live performance situation."
 Does the "Fudge" argument add any latency to a patch? for instance , if i make a patch that uses a quickthresh obj, with :

a base thresh time of 5ms 
-and-
Fudge time of 30 ms -

quick-question-about-quickthresh

> Does the "Fudge" argument add any latency to a patch? for instance ,

> if i make a patch that uses a quickthresh obj, with :

> a base thresh time of 5ms -and- Fudge time of 30 ms -

This is typically answered yourself quicker than posting as a question. 

If I wanted to know I would have to test it...

mHatsys schrieb:
> Does the "Fudge" argument add any latency to a patch? for instance ,
> if i make a patch that uses a quickthresh obj, with :
>
> a base thresh time of 5ms -and- Fudge time of 30 ms -
>
> is the overall latency 5 ms or 35 ms?

This is typically answered yourself quicker than posting as a question. 
If I wanted to know I would have to test it...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


Quick question about quickthresh