sabo

Hi, I am playing around with jit.expr to understand some of its functionality from an intuitive level. I made this patch to play with jit.multiple. I imagine that if I use in[0], in[1], and in[2] as variables, I should have a third inlet, as I'm referencing that inlet through in[2]. However, my jit.expr object still only has two inlets. Here is my example patch:

quick-question-jit-expr-not-giving-me-a-third-inlet

look at the helpfile and you will see an example of how @inputs can be used to specify how many inputs you want to have. this will make them appear

look at the helpfile and you will see an example of how  @inputs can be used to specify how many inputs you want to have. this will make them appear


quick question - jit.expr not giving me a third inlet