<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: recording long performance with jit.vcr &#8211; opinions?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/#post-53931</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[recording long performance with jit.vcr &#8211; opinions?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/#post-53931</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>doldrum</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I was wondering if anyone has used jit.vcr to record anything longer than an hour.  </p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve found on the forums, jit.vcr isnt that stable. From my own personal experience jit.vcr takes up an enormous amount of space and records at a low quality. </p>
<p>Im trying to decide between an actual vcr, a tivo, or jit.vcr.  This is the closing of our show and recording the opening failed miserably so id like to get it right.</p>
<p>So my questions are:<br />
Will jit.vcr be reliable for 1 + hours of recording?<br />
What codec would you recommend for highest quality?<br />
Will recording at a high quality / or even at all effect a cpu intensive patch?<br />
Would you recommend a better option &#8211; with a student budget in mind?</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/#post-194067</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: recording long performance with jit.vcr &#8211; opinions?]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/recording-long-performance-with-jit-vcr-opinions/#post-194067</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Luke Woodbury</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>If your patch is already CPU intensive then I really don&#8217;t think jit.vcr is going to work for you in this context I&#8217;m afraid. Ideally you want another machine/device to record it on and I&#8217;m sure someone else can advise you better than me on that.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

