Forums > Gen

Sample and loop

March 22, 2012 | 7:13 pm

While working on something, I needed a way to capture a sample and then loop it, but have the loop length dependent on the length of the recording. I whipped up a solution in Gen~ and thought it might be useful for someone else.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 22, 2012 | 7:57 pm

Fantastic bit of code. I just added functionality for length of loop and a reverse button.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 22, 2012 | 11:15 pm

Also wouldn’t be hard to add in a rate control (just multiply the sample playback increment before %). fun stuff


March 22, 2012 | 11:52 pm

Like this?

I seem to get either silence or white noise when speed isn’t 1.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 23, 2012 | 2:02 am

It looks very interesting but (I’m a total noob with gen) what is the advantage of doing it in gen~ rather than with the classic groove~ object ?

I’m currently building something for doing, more or less, the same thing and I didn’t think of using gen~

Thanks for any light.


March 23, 2012 | 5:58 pm

Close, but the * should go before the + actually. You are multiplying the increment amount to change speed. With the speed control, I also switched to a higher-quality interpolation mode so I can buttery smooth slow-downs. Try this:

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

@Spip The advantage – for me at least – is the ability to have a fairly fine-grained control over how it works, and be able to expand and alter that at will. The groove~ object is a little bit of a black box that just works. Also, with my version, the phase of the loop is in sync with the recording. I could also expand this to do overdubbing with just a few more parts. Also, the @interp options in the Gen~ objects sound really good.


March 23, 2012 | 6:46 pm

Ah I see where I was going wrong. Sounds great!

I just added a sync output like groove~ and an output for length of sample.

I’m trying to change the start point of the sample though without too much luck.

(it’s getting messy!)

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 23, 2012 | 7:12 pm

I think this is what you want. This doesn’t protect you from reading past the end of the buffer though, so you might want to further complicate that calculation by scaling the range based on length, or passing through % or something.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 23, 2012 | 7:25 pm

Thanks for the explanation !

New homeworks to do :)


March 23, 2012 | 9:07 pm

Thanks for posting this Andrew. Added a couple of simple things- stop, stutter, restart and overdub. I tried to use splat for the overdub and couldn’t make it work. Could you post an example using splat?

`

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –


March 23, 2012 | 9:50 pm

With splat you just divide the play position (in samples) by the buffer size, which you can get from the left outlet of the gen~ buffer object. Otherwise it’s basically the same as poke (from what I can tell), but with linear interpolation if you’re playing at different speeds.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 24, 2012 | 12:12 am

>I could also expand this to do overdubbing with just a few more parts

… well… if it isn’t too much bother… I’d sure like to get off and running with a looper like that… :) Pretty please?


March 24, 2012 | 1:07 am

Here’s a patch with all the above contributions including overdub…

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 25, 2012 | 4:56 pm

brilliant


March 26, 2012 | 11:58 pm

It’s such a privilege to be part of a community with so many smart, creative people. Not to mention generous. Thanks!!!


March 27, 2012 | 2:38 am

I know how to do this outside of gen~, but is there a way to ramp the attack/release inside gen~ to minimize clicks?


March 27, 2012 | 5:32 pm

There’s no rule that EVERYTHING has to happen inside the gen~ object. ;) That said, here is a simple way to do linear ramps between 0 and 1 for an A/R envelope. Hope that helps.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

March 28, 2012 | 1:21 am

Thank you, Andrew. :-) Just trying to keep learning all this wonderful new stuff.


July 19, 2012 | 6:59 pm

Interpolation using [splat] seems to not work when referencing a buffer in reverse….am I doing something wrong, or is this not supported? If not, is there a possibility that it will be, or am I going to have to build something that does this myself? I’m trying to get rid of the need for ipoke~ in my tape looper patch.


July 21, 2012 | 7:56 pm

Hi Guys, This is a really sweet patch.

I’m trying to fold it into a larger patch and i’m running into a couple noob roadblocks. First I’m trying to convert the gen looper to record in stereo (with the option of then controlling playback of each channel independently) so for example on play back the left channel could play forward and the right channel in reverse, or setting different start and end loop point. different speeds per channel etc…. I tried duplicating the inside of the gen~ changing the inputs on the copy but it’s not wanting to record to a two channel buffer.

The second question is, this will all live in a bpatcher of which i will load several instances of in a parent patcher and I’ve done this before by prefixing names in the bpatcher with #0. but when I try to use the #0 in the gen object to rename the buffer name i get a gen compile error saying that #0_lp is not a valid variable name. So I’m not sure how to get around that.

Thanks for the help and the inspiring code to start with!
Attached is a copy of my hacked version which is not working correctly.


July 25, 2012 | 3:58 am

Hi there jacobgolden,

There’s a couple of problems with that genpatcher — first of all, the #0- prefixing doesn’t work in gen patchers (and probably never will…). Instead, create a named buffer object (e.g. [buffer mybuf]) and in the parent Max patcher send a message "mybuf #0_lp" to the gen~. Also, [splat] does not support different @interp modes at the moment.

I hope that helps. Here’s the gen~ with those changes made:

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

July 31, 2012 | 9:00 pm

Thanks Graham i will check that out and report back. Best!


July 9, 2013 | 5:55 pm

I tried to modify the patch (Rick’s version with overdub), so the loop will sync to the transport. After a few hilarious attempts, I realized I may need help from people wiser than myself.

Can anyone suggest a way to do this?


December 14, 2013 | 1:08 pm

Hello!!!

But never work overdub for me!!!


March 18, 2014 | 2:45 pm

i would like to run 6 instances of this simultaneously but do not have gen!

would someone kindly post 6 versions of this that address buffers with different names?

ex. dummy, dummy1, dummy2, etc

thank you so much!
Josh


May 26, 2014 | 6:57 pm

Ever once in a while I come back to this patch and try and figure why the overdub part stopped working.
[Splat] use to need different timing information than [Poke]. From what I found that’s no longer true.
They now seem to be the same except that [Splat] writes with linear interpolation between samples and
overdubs the new and old samples.

Anyway… here’s a new working version and I added a new function, multiply I guess is the best name.
It’s basically a new loop that runs in sync with the original recording, except that the new loop can be
two or three times or however many times as long as the original loop.

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –

Viewing 26 posts - 1 through 26 (of 26 total)