Roth

I'm interested in trying to be able to reverse the output of [scale] back to the original values when the exponential mode is being used (I know there are easier ways to go back and forth doing exponential scaling, but since this is an upgrade for an existing project, I'd rather not need to come up with a new scale method to use).

Before solving the reverse equation, I just wanted to check that I am reading the formula that is in the [scale] reference correctly. First of all, the documentation says a, b, c are "the three typed-in arguments" and that the "third argument must be a floating-point number greater than 1. These statements seem to be in contradiction with each other so am I correct in assuming that a, b, c are the last three of the five typed in arguments? "Low Output Value", "High Output Value", "Exponential Base" respectively? If so, either I'm not reading it correctly, or there is a typo in the documentation. Could someone tell me if this clarified form is correct?

There seems to be a lot of implied multiplication in what is written--is there some missing operator?

Also, I tried both, but what base log is that? log10? or ln?

Before solving the reverse equation, I just wanted to check that I am reading the formula that is in the [scale] reference correctly.  First of all, the documentation says a, b, c are "the three typed-in arguments" and that the "third argument must be a floating-point number greater than 1.  These statements seem to be in contradiction with each other so am I correct in assuming that a, b, c are the last three of the five typed in arguments? "Low Output Value", "High Output Value", "Exponential Base" respectively?  If so, either I'm not reading it correctly, or there is a typo in the documentation.  Could someone tell me if this clarified form is correct?

scale-exponential-equation

Just a little bump hoping that someone from Cycling will notice now that it is no longer the weekend.

[scale] exponential equation