Cycling 74 » Topic: Scope~ sizing…? http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/feed Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:13:12 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-58321 <![CDATA[Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-58321 Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:20:06 +0000 Peter McCulloch I’ve got a M4L patch that uses 4 small scope~ objects. On my machine, it displays correctly, but on a tester’s machine it makes them all the same size (too big). Has anyone else experienced this?

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209552 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209552 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:57:12 +0000 ShelLuser Can’t comment without actually seeing the device but.. Does this all happen on the same platform (so all of you are using Windows or Mac, or…) ?

For whats it worth; I created a M4L scope patch some time ago (M4LScope) which can be found here:

http://www.maxforlive.com/library/device.php?id=428

As you can see its a relative simple patch (also one of my first). But I’ve never had any reports about scope sizes going haywire. Then again; I’m not using small but substandard sizes..

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209553 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209553 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:57:12 +0000 ShelLuser Can’t comment without actually seeing the device but.. Does this all happen on the same platform (so all of you are using Windows or Mac, or…) ?

For whats it worth; I created a M4L scope patch some time ago (M4LScope) which can be found here:

http://www.maxforlive.com/library/device.php?id=428

As you can see its a relative simple patch (also one of my first). But I’ve never had any reports about scope sizes going haywire. Then again; I’m not using small but substandard sizes..

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209554 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209554 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:22:41 +0000 Ben Bracken Hi Peter,

We haven’t run across this before, but if you are able to come up with a device and some specs/steps to repro, we will be happy to take a look.

-Ben

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209556 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209556 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:22:41 +0000 Ben Bracken Hi Peter,

We haven’t run across this before, but if you are able to come up with a device and some specs/steps to repro, we will be happy to take a look.

-Ben

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209555 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209555 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:08:17 +0000 Peter McCulloch Will do, but won’t be until next week as I’m away. This has been on one platform (Mac). I tried freezing the sizes for the various scope~ objects, as from my user’s screenshot it looks like the scope~ is not resizing from the default size, but I haven’t had a chance to try it on another machine yet.

Not sure if this affects things, but the whole instrument is inside a giant bpatcher, as I’ve got two pages for it (back page is options). If freezing doesn’t work, I’ll see if I can cook up an example for reproduction.

thanks,
PM

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209557 <![CDATA[Re: Scope~ sizing…?]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/scope-sizing/#post-209557 Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:08:17 +0000 Peter McCulloch Will do, but won’t be until next week as I’m away. This has been on one platform (Mac). I tried freezing the sizes for the various scope~ objects, as from my user’s screenshot it looks like the scope~ is not resizing from the default size, but I haven’t had a chance to try it on another machine yet.

Not sure if this affects things, but the whole instrument is inside a giant bpatcher, as I’ve got two pages for it (back page is options). If freezing doesn’t work, I’ll see if I can cook up an example for reproduction.

thanks,
PM

]]>