bryanteoh

I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send

messages between 4 laptops. At this point, I only need to send max

messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the

future would be nice too). I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I

understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more

importantly, receive from one computer at a time. Are there any other

objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send
messages between 4 laptops.  At this point, I only need to send max
messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the
future would be nice too).  I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I
understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more
importantly, receive from one computer at a time.  Are there any other
objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

Bryan
-- 
http://www.techniquolor.com
http://www.ksod.net


sending-messages-over-a-network-2

> Are there any other objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

On 27/05/07, Bryan Teoh  wrote:
> Are there any other objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?


>I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send

>messages between 4 laptops. At this point, I only need to send max

>messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the

>future would be nice too). I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I

>understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more

>importantly, receive from one computer at a time. Are there any other

>objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

that's exactly what we are doing here and updsend / udpreceive works 

and never spend much time on it but maxhole is great - on C74 site 

for more than 2 computers an ethernet router or hub is what you need.

We just had problems whan one of the machines was an intel mac 

running windows xp (and not macOS) but this might be due to our 

limited knowledge of the windows world....

but it is very easy to receive/send to/from different machines

>I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send
>messages between 4 laptops.  At this point, I only need to send max
>messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the
>future would be nice too).  I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I
>understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more
>importantly, receive from one computer at a time.  Are there any other
>objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

that's exactly what we are doing here and updsend / udpreceive works 
like a charm

and never spend much time on it but maxhole is great - on C74 site 
there is a subject on all of it

We just had problems whan one of the machines was an intel mac 
running windows xp (and not macOS) but this might be due to our 
limited knowledge of the windows world....

kasper
-- 
  Kasper T. Toeplitz
noise, composition, bass, computer
http://www.sleazeArt.com

You can use udpsend and udpreceive and all the mxj classes [mxj 

net.udp.send] [mxj net.udp.recv] or [mxj net.tcp.send] [mxj 

You can create a network for trasmit or receive datas simultaneausly 

using differents ports numbers (I use also different port numbers for 

Il giorno 28/mag/07, alle ore 08:50, Bryan Teoh ha scritto:

> I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send

> messages between 4 laptops. At this point, I only need to send max

> messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the

> future would be nice too). I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I

> understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more

> importantly, receive from one computer at a time. Are there any other

> objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?

You can use udpsend and udpreceive and all the mxj classes [mxj  
net.udp.send] [mxj net.udp.recv] or [mxj net.tcp.send] [mxj  
net.tcp.recv]

You can create a network for trasmit or receive datas simultaneausly  
using differents ports numbers (I use also different port numbers for  
send to and receive from)

> I'm working on a set of patches that require the ability to send
> messages between 4 laptops.  At this point, I only need to send max
> messages (although being able to send signals over a network in the
> future would be nice too).  I've tried netsend and netsend~, but as I
> understand it, you are only able to send to, and even more
> importantly, receive from one computer at a time.  Are there any other
> objects with networking capabilities that I should be checking out?
>
> Bryan
> -- 
> http://www.techniquolor.com
> http://www.ksod.net


On 28 May 2007, at 08:14, Kasper T Toeplitz wrote:

> for more than 2 computers an ethernet router or hub is what you need.

To be pedantic - the thing you *don't* want is a hub, since it'll be 

prone to packet collisions. Actually, you can't buy hubs any more, 

A router is overkill, but can be useful - for example, we used a 

Linksys running Linux on stage a few months ago, so that we could 

grant DHCP addresses centrally and keep track of what was going on.

To be pedantic - the thing you *don't* want is a hub, since it'll be  
prone to packet collisions. Actually, you can't buy hubs any more,  
and switches are pretty cheap.

A router is overkill, but can be useful - for example, we used a  
Linksys running Linux on stage a few months ago, so that we could  
grant DHCP addresses centrally and keep track of what was going on.

Nick Rothwell / Cassiel.com Limited
www.cassiel.com
www.myspace.com/cassieldotcom
www.loadbang.net


>On 28 May 2007, at 08:14, Kasper T Toeplitz wrote:

>>for more than 2 computers an ethernet router or hub is what you need.

>To be pedantic - the thing you *don't* want is a hub, since it'll be 

>prone to packet collisions. Actually, you can't buy hubs any more, 

>A router is overkill, but can be useful - for example, we used a 

>Linksys running Linux on stage a few months ago, so that we could 

>grant DHCP addresses centrally and keep track of what was going on.

yeah sorry, i meant switch - but forgot the word

i mean those little boxes they sell you which have ethernet plugs in....... :-)

>On 28 May 2007, at 08:14, Kasper T Toeplitz wrote:
>
>>for more than 2 computers an ethernet router or hub is what you need.
>
>To be pedantic - the thing you *don't* want is a hub, since it'll be 
>prone to packet collisions. Actually, you can't buy hubs any more, 
>and switches are pretty cheap.
>
>A router is overkill, but can be useful - for example, we used a 
>Linksys running Linux on stage a few months ago, so that we could 
>grant DHCP addresses centrally and keep track of what was going on.
>

sending messages over a network