<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: sfrecord~ / record~ &amp; buffer~</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-40507</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[sfrecord~ / record~ &amp; buffer~]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-40507</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>kp*</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>I usually use sfrecord~ but for this patch i find myself needing a way  <br />
to pause the recording.</p>
<p>sfrecord~ doesn&#8217;t have a pause message so i just though i would use  <br />
record~ &#038; buffer~ the problems is that i need the ability to write the  <br />
file and with record~ and buffer~ I am finding that i have to set some  <br />
very large buffer size, which is less than ideal because when i use  <br />
the patch to make small recordings i then have to deal with the vast  <br />
zero padding at the end of the sound file, if i make the buffer too  <br />
small &#8230;. you get the picture, I don&#8217;t want to manage buffer sizes  <br />
for every eventuality.</p>
<p>So it seems like i am sunk since what i need is a record object that  <br />
is not fixed in size, but that also allows me to pause while capturing  <br />
audio, much like if you were going to use max as a portable voice  <br />
recorder.</p>
<p>on Mac OS X 10.5 intel, Max/MSP 4.x no jitter.</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
<p>-kp&#8211;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-143419</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: sfrecord~ / record~ &#038; buffer~]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-143419</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Rob Ramirez</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>i think your best bet is to use a separate record buffer sized as large as necessary for the longest recording you will make.</p>
<p>then when the recording is done, you copy only the recorded samples to a new buffer~, which has peen sized to the exact length of the recording.</p>
<p>look at peek~, it handles the copying.  you will also have to make use of the record~ sync outlet, and the mstosamps~ object.</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-143420</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: sfrecord~ / record~ &#038; buffer~]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/sfrecord-record-buffer/#post-143420</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Luke Hall</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>You might want to check out Nao Tokui&#8217;s [slice~] external for calculating how much of the massive [buffer~] you used in recording. Other than that I would agree with what Robert has suggested.</p>
<p>lh</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

