Wetterberg

I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and I've 

uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in glorious 

3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.

I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing my 

Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection going 

from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I haven't been 

Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite a stack of pics, 

Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so grab 

whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are 1680*1050 

http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/show/

I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and I've 
uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in glorious 
3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.

I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing my 
Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection going 
from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I haven't been 
Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite a stack of pics, 
nonetheless.

Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so grab 
whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are 1680*1050 
and going up.

Andreas.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/show/
- next stop: Colour theory.
-----


sharingjitter-desktop-images

Those are really nice! Is this done all done in matrix world, gl

world? In each shot, I feel like I know what you're doing, but

there's always something that throws me for a loop. That's great!

Since you're in the sharing mood, if you want to share techniques or

anything, please do! Great work, either way.

> I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and I've

> uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in glorious

> 3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.

> I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing my

> Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection going

> from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I haven't been

> Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite a stack of pics,

> Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so grab

> whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are 1680*1050

Those are really nice!  Is this done all done in matrix world, gl
world?  In each shot, I feel like I know what you're doing, but
there's always something that throws me for a loop.  That's great!
Since you're in the sharing mood, if you want to share techniques or
anything, please do!  Great work, either way.

On 6/11/07, Andreas Wetterberg  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and I've
> uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in glorious
> 3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.
>
> I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing my
> Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection going
> from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I haven't been
> Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite a stack of pics,
> nonetheless.
>
> Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so grab
> whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are 1680*1050
> and going up.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/show/
> - next stop: Colour theory.
> -----
>


oh these are just lovely. really lovely! i wonder, is meta.am on 

this forum in some capacity? he'd love these.

On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:16 PM, Andreas Wetterberg wrote:

> I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and 

> I've uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in 

> glorious 3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.

> I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing 

> my Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection 

> going from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I 

> haven't been Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite 

> Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so 

> grab whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are 

oh these are just lovely.  really lovely!  i wonder, is meta.am on  
this forum in some capacity?  he'd love these.

> Hey,
>
> I've been messing around with a dual-screen frame grab thing, and  
> I've uploaded a small series of Jitter-generated desktop images in  
> glorious 3360*1050 pixel format to my flickr-page, link below.
>
> I may or may not have mentioned this, but I've started catalogueing  
> my Jitter progress on flickr, too - I wanted to make a collection  
> going from the very earliest images I did up to present date. I  
> haven't been Jitter-patching long, but I seem to have amassed quite  
> a stack of pics, nonetheless.
>
> Personally I feel some of the newer stuff is very very nice, so  
> grab whatchalike and use them in your sets or what ever. Most are  
> 1680*1050 and going up.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/show/
> - next stop: Colour theory.
> -----
>


those are breathtaking! Some of the most organic looking images I've

seen in the jitter world in quite some time. I second the sharing of

techniques, although since I just recently finished the tuts myself,

I'm sure it would be over my head. It would be interesting to hear

about your thought process, though. I'd love to also see some of your

those are breathtaking!  Some of the most organic looking images I've
seen in the jitter world in quite some time.  I second the sharing of
techniques, although since I just recently finished the tuts myself,
I'm sure it would be over my head.  It would be interesting to hear
about your thought process, though.  I'd love to also see some of your
video work if you have any uploaded.

Bryan
-- 
http://www.bryanteoh.com
http://www.ksod.net


Do I recognize wesley smith's projective textures patch in some of these? ;)

Good idea to grab stills from these endless sources of unique material. Nice stills too.

> Do I recognize wesley smith's projective textures patch in some of these? ;)

> Good idea to grab stills from these endless sources of unique material. Nice stills too.

You're right - I did three of those to test the dual-screen captures, I 

Mattijs Kneppers skrev:
> Do I recognize wesley smith's projective textures patch in some of these? ;)
>
> Good idea to grab stills from these endless sources of unique material. Nice stills too.
>
You're right - I did three of those to test the dual-screen captures, I 
think. Looked great.

> Those are really nice! Is this done all done in matrix world, gl

> world? In each shot, I feel like I know what you're doing, but

> there's always something that throws me for a loop. That's great!

> Since you're in the sharing mood, if you want to share techniques or

> anything, please do! Great work, either way.

It is based on simple jit.gl.sketch objects being captured to texture 

and manipulated with jit.gl.slab's, built on a sparse patch contributed 

bu JKC ( I think). It's the only way I could do processing at the scale 

I wanted, but it works really nice with my graphics card. There's one 

single bug, and that is the fact that for some reason floating point 

textures don't work on my machine, so it's all char.

Here is a full screenshot of the patch, which might help clarify some of it:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/542101368/

keith manlove skrev:
> Those are really nice!  Is this done all done in matrix world, gl
> world?  In each shot, I feel like I know what you're doing, but
> there's always something that throws me for a loop.  That's great!
> Since you're in the sharing mood, if you want to share techniques or
> anything, please do!  Great work, either way.
Hi Keith, thank you for the kind words!
It is based on simple jit.gl.sketch objects being captured to texture 
and manipulated with jit.gl.slab's, built on a sparse patch contributed 
bu JKC ( I think). It's the only way I could do processing at the scale 
I wanted, but it works really nice with my graphics card. There's one 
single bug, and that is the fact that for some reason floating point 
textures don't work on my machine, so it's all char.

Here is a full screenshot of the patch, which might help clarify some of it:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/542101368/  - click "All 
Sizes" to see the full res image.

> Hard- and software for interactive audiovisual sampling

On 6/12/07, Mattijs Kneppers  wrote:
>
> Do I recognize wesley smith's projective textures patch in some of these? ;)
>
> Good idea to grab stills from these endless sources of unique material. Nice stills too.
>
> Mattijs
> --
> SmadSteck - http://www.smadsteck.nl
> Hard- and software for interactive audiovisual sampling
>


Nice stuff. You should add it to the Jitter photo group!

Hey Andreas,
Nice stuff.  You should add it to the Jitter photo group!

>Here is a full screenshot of the patch, which might help clarify some of it:

This is probably not sufficiently patch-centric, but I'm still curious -

are you generating a whole table full of poolballs using the (invisible)

Lemur here loaded chock full of tasty inertia, et. al, or am I

imagining at a more restrained and traditional slideresque of UI

on the floor there's a long wooden table/on the table there's an open book/

on the page there's a detailed drawing/and on the drawing is the name I took

>Here is a full screenshot of the patch, which might help clarify some of it:
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/18877453@N00/542101368/  - click "All 
>Sizes" to see the full res image.
>
>I'd be happy to answer any questions :)

This is probably not sufficiently patch-centric, but I'm still curious -
are you generating a whole table full of poolballs using the (invisible)
Lemur here loaded chock full of tasty inertia, et. al, or am I
imagining at a more restrained and traditional slideresque of UI
sending that data in the upper left?

-- 
on the floor there's a long wooden table/on the table there's an open book/
on the page there's a detailed drawing/and on the drawing is the name I took
Gregory Taylor http://www.rtqe.net


I don't have anything online as of yet. I haven't found a nice enough 

format of recording my live "vj" work yet. Maybe I will just record a 

few jams to mp3s or something - I am definitely feeling motivated 

Bryan Teoh skrev:
> I'd love to also see some of your
> video work if you have any uploaded.
>
> Bryan
Hi Bryan,
I don't have anything online as of yet. I haven't found a nice enough 
format of recording my live "vj" work yet. Maybe I will just record a 
few jams to mp3s or something - I am definitely feeling motivated 
towards that now!

> Nice stuff. You should add it to the Jitter photo group!

I definitely will do - but it wouldn't be kosher to add the whole 

library, would it? I'd have to pick some favourites, which is harder 

andrew benson skrev:
> Hey Andreas,
> Nice stuff.  You should add it to the Jitter photo group!
>
> http://flickr.com/groups/jitter
>
Thanks!
I definitely will do - but it wouldn't be kosher to add the whole 
library, would it? I'd have to pick some favourites, which is harder 
than I initially imagined!

I just had a quick jam with the system. I definitely need to get more 

preset control routings in there, but it's coming along nicely:

http://covops.dreamhosters.com/dropbox/jitter_test_run_01.mp4

-this is a bit more tech in the beginning, then gets more crystalline 

and patterny towards the end. Random mp3.

Andreas Wetterberg skrev:
> Bryan Teoh skrev:
>> I'd love to also see some of your
>> video work if you have any uploaded.
>>
I just had a quick jam with the system. I definitely need to get more 
preset control routings in there, but it's coming along nicely:
http://covops.dreamhosters.com/dropbox/jitter_test_run_01.mp4
-this is a bit more tech in the beginning, then gets more crystalline 
and patterny towards the end. Random mp3.

[sharing]Jitter desktop images.