soundcard w/ more then 24 outputs_any idea ?

Jan 25, 2006 at 5:21pm

soundcard w/ more then 24 outputs_any idea ?

hi List ,
I will be working for an artist whose intent is to display sound objects from 144 speakers.
therefore with my collaborator we are looking at the best solution in terms of soundcards. Of course we are not hoping to have one channel per speaker, but we still try to figure out the best solution.
we will probably using a G4 tower ( w/ OSX 10.4, max/msp 4.5.4 ) since the installation does not require that much MSP process other then just reading small soundfiles and dispatching them through various channels.

we are thinking in investing in the 24i/o MOTU interface.

http://www.zzounds.com/item–MTU24IO

does any one have another suggestion or advice ?
quantiy rather then quality being the goal of this piece.

thanks in advance, i have been trying to find the answer in previous threads but could not find satisfaction ;)

a bientot

http://www.marswalkers.org

#24097
Jan 25, 2006 at 5:55pm

> I will be working for an artist whose intent is to display sound
> objects from 144 speakers.

One way is to use a matrix system which is basically panning your
input mono/stereo signal to 8 speakers based on a control signal. One
example is this box (only 128 outputs, though):

http://www.soundscape-studios.no/produkter/dvc/e_dvc.html

ARJ’

#69223
Jan 25, 2006 at 6:14pm

On 25-janv.-06, at 18:21, karl-otto von wrote:

> does any one have another suggestion or advice ?

With the pci424, you can plug “only” 4 motu 24i/o, and anyway, the
pci424 manages only 96 channels.
But you can also try to add firewire interfaces and do an aggregate.
Curious to see wether OSX can manage so many outputs.

I once worked with 2 motu interfaces, and it seemed I had access to all
28 channels without any problem.

p

#69224
Jan 25, 2006 at 6:19pm

Hello Karl

At BEAST, we have often done 4 x 24 i/o (96 i/o) on one single
pci-424 in a g5, without any problem. Lots of pleasure, no hasle,
all the drivers behaving perfectly. Not cheap, but really reliable.

good luck

pa

ps CoreAudio sees it as one 96 in/out interface, which simplify the
task greatly.

#69225
Jan 26, 2006 at 8:23am

Hello,

i would suggest to use any MADI solution. Advantages : 64-128 tracks /
BNC for not so much money, long long long long range available (not like
adat), handy. The RME HDSP MADI is the best i could advice you. You will
have to rent a mix console that has a MADI option, but all digital
Yamaha’s can get the optionnal card for MADI handling and it’s not much
in the final bill (if you’re not buying it, of course !).

best regards

f.e

#69226
Jan 26, 2006 at 8:25am

I forget to tell : if you’re on a laptop, there’s an adaptater that
works to plug PCI with PCMCIA…

cheers

f.e

#69227
Jan 26, 2006 at 8:42am

If I remember correctly the motu’s can be linked, they even promissed
at one point that when a musician needed more in/outs then the linked
motu system could deliver they took the guy out for dinner (and I’m
not kidding)

best regards
pieter

#69228
Jan 26, 2006 at 10:50am

> If I remember correctly the motu’s can be linked, they even
> promissed at one point that when a musician needed more in/outs
> then the linked motu system could deliver they took the guy out for
> dinner (and I’m not kidding)

From the old Emagic Unitor 8 manual:

“If one fine day you should discover that 16 Unitor8 units are not
sufficient anymore, we would like to treat you to dinner in order to
find a profitable solution together.”

[= 2048 midi chans, 16 Unitors via 2 serial ports on old Macs]

MOTU/audio linkage more modest, I fear…

dh

#69229
Jan 26, 2006 at 5:19pm

thanks for your advices,

the RME solution seems attempting , could you give me more info on how it would work on the msp end .
would i have to control the mixer through midi ? or do i use the dac~ in the same way i would with a regular firewire soundcard.

( dac~ 1 2 3 … 96 ? )

i have never worked with an RME Hammerfall HDSP MADI 24/96 128 Channel PCI Interface before.

thanks

>Hello,

i would suggest to use any MADI solution. Advantages : 64-128 tracks /
BNC for not so much money, long long long long range available (not like
adat), handy. The RME HDSP MADI is the best i could advice you. You will
have to rent a mix console that has a MADI option, but all digital
Yamaha’s can get the optionnal card for MADI handling and it’s not much
in the final bill (if you’re not buying it, of course !).

best regards

f.e

#69230
Jan 26, 2006 at 5:41pm

the dac~ solution is the way to go
– in the old days (that is OS9 on mac, and max…. some old max,
maybe 3.xxx) there was a possibility to control the internal mixer of
the RME from max, with a special max object, but (as far as i
understand) since RME did change the internal architecture the old
code does not work, and RME never answered mails asking for the new
implementation – i found a developer (Laurent Pottier) ready to write
a new object, but we never receiced any answer from RME

best

kasper

Kasper T. Toeplitz
noise, composition, bass, computer

http://www.sleazeArt.com

#69231
Jan 27, 2006 at 8:52am

#69232

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.