Cycling 74 » Topic: strange pattr behaviour after update to Max 5.1.5 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/feed Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:34:04 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4 http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-52078 <![CDATA[strange pattr behaviour after update to Max 5.1.5]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-52078 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:53:49 +0000 pverhees Hello everybody,

I have a working patch in Max 5.1.4. (OSX)
When trying to run the same file on Max 5.1.5 pattr notes something like:
pattr: bufferfield can’t bindto buffer-field.

The same patch works as said without any problem in 5.1.3

We discovered that we couldn’t create a bindto to any messagebox. Binding to a number is no problem. Did anybody notice the same behaviour?
This moment I can’t test it any further because the machine I am working on is MAX 5.1.4

Any help is appreciated.

P

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-187054 <![CDATA[Re: strange pattr behaviour after update to Max 5.1.5]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-187054 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:04:47 +0000 Andrew Pask The error *message* got restored in 5.1.5 – this doesn’t mean there was no error in 5.1.4.

Message boxes are not supported in the pattr world. I suspect your patch might work the same, despite the error.

Let us know if you find out otherwise.

-A

]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-187055 <![CDATA[Re: strange pattr behaviour after update to Max 5.1.5]]> http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/strange-pattr-behaviour-after-update-to-max-5-1-5/#post-187055 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:40:25 +0000 pverhees Hi Andrew,
Ah, of course. I actually know the messagebox isn’t “pattered” but because of the new error-message I succeed to forget such a basic thing.
Interesting to discover there are these kind of faults in my patch. The total is so complex and never had a problem…

Thanks!

]]>