Jean-Francois Charles

time-value-syntax-why-not-line

> Why doesn't [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the

This is the least of the line object's problems, all of which we hope to address in a future update.

> Why doesn't [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the
> new time value system?

>> Why doesn't [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the

> This is the least of the line object's problems, all of which we hope to

>> Why doesn't [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the
>> new time value system?
>
> This is the least of the line object's problems, all of which we hope to
> address in a future update.
>
> David Z.
>
Great news!
Thanks for the answer.
J-F.

I could start using lines again when that happens. ATM everything is done with (q)metro.

Great stuff!
I could start using lines again when that happens. ATM everything is done with (q)metro.


Time value syntax: why not [line]?