Time value syntax: why not [line]?

May 5, 2008 at 11:29pm

Time value syntax: why not [line]?

#37572
May 6, 2008 at 4:49am

> Why doesn’t [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the
> new time value system?

This is the least of the line object’s problems, all of which we hope to address in a future update.

David Z.

#129926
May 6, 2008 at 2:14pm

>> Why doesn’t [line] accept messages like |200 4n|, whereas [line~] likes the
>> new time value system?
>
> This is the least of the line object’s problems, all of which we hope to
> address in a future update.
>
> David Z.
>
Great news!
Thanks for the answer.
J-F.

#129927
May 6, 2008 at 3:27pm

Great stuff!
I could start using lines again when that happens. ATM everything is done with (q)metro.

#129928

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.