<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Two Computer Video setup&#8230;</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-26727</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Two Computer Video setup&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-26727</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 19:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>iamcomputo@gmail.com</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>Hey all,</p>
<p>Looking for a bit of advice.</p>
<p>I have a PBG4 1.67 and a Tibook 867MHz, an Isight, and a Canopus advc<br />
capture device.</p>
<p>I am doing a live video performance, and I was wondering what some<br />
suggested configurations of these would be, to get the best quality<br />
output.  What I am currently planning on is&#8230;</p>
<p>PBG4 1.67 running my main OpenGL patch, with the ADVC device attached<br />
as an input device.  Then on my tibook, I have the isight going in,<br />
and then routing the composite video out and into the advc on the<br />
PBG4.  Seems to make sense.</p>
<p>Any suggestions?  I also plan on having a few devices attached for control&#8230;<br />
like a PS2 controller, and probably an Xsession, for virtual mixing.</p>
<p>I am open for any ideas, as I want to make this setup as efficient as possible.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Computo</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80217</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Two Computer Video setup&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80217</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 21:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>vade</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>thats what I would suggest.</p>
<p>If you want to remove latency, you might look at a DFG 1394, which  <br />
brings in uncompressed video via firewire, and removes the ~ 7 frame  <br />
latency that most ADC~ DV capture devices impose (as well as the CPU  <br />
overhead of decompressing the DV Stream). Just a thought :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1394imaging.com/en/products/converters/" rel="nofollow">http://www.1394imaging.com/en/products/converters/</a>? <br />
sid=u62d6eij3msts4sn33971rbem4</p>
<p>
v a d e //</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vade.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.vade.info</a><br />
abstrakt.vade.info</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80218</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Two Computer Video setup&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80218</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2006 22:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>iamcomputo@gmail.com</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>WOW, thats a pricy little box.</p>
<p>A bit to rich for my blood, to resolve only a 7ms lag.</p>
<p>I wouldnt get it for audio, so I wont get it for video.</p>
<p>But thanks for the advice!</p>
<p>Any other thoughts?</p>
<p>Joe</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80219</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Two Computer Video setup&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80219</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>vade</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>7 frames is a lot more than 7 milliseconds.</p>
<p>1 frame is typically 1 30th of a second, or 33.333 milliseconds. 7  <br />
frames is 233.33 milliseconds, which is .. enough to loose  <br />
syncopation imo. It also resolves decompression issues, it frees up  <br />
your CPU from decoding the incoming stream.</p>
<p>*shrug*</p>
<p>
v a d e //</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vade.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.vade.info</a><br />
abstrakt.vade.info</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80220</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Two Computer Video setup&#8230;]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/two-computer-video-setup/#post-80220</link>
					<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>iamcomputo@gmail.com</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>ah, I read your message wrong.  yes, 7 frames  is a lot, but for the<br />
application Im using it for, its not a problem.</p>
<p>But thanks for clarifying.  now that device seems like a worthwhile piece.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

