UI objects and efficient coding

Jul 8, 2012 at 6:45pm

UI objects and efficient coding

I’ve tried to avoid UI objects as much as possible since I started patching -expecting my patches to grow to a point where I’m pushing performance limits at some stage.

But I’m creating a lot of subpatchers and abstractions that need options to be set, and it would be great if they could have userinterface elements which may be made visible (by using bpatcher) or hidden when they are pre-set with arguments.

My question is: when a UI object is hidden in an abstraction, is it still costing more CPU time than a non-UI object?
is it different whether it is a subpatcher or an abstraction/

Thanks!!
Bas

#39879
Jul 8, 2012 at 7:29pm

In most GUI environment, a graphical object is sent an event when it should redraw itself. This will happen when the visibility of the object change to “show”, or if it was partially covered and then uncovered. If the visible aspects of the object itself are changed programmatically, then it will be “invalidated” which will then cause a redraw event to be triggered. However, that redraw should not happen while the object is not visible. If max objects behave this way, then there should be little or no impact on the system when the objects are hidden.
The other factor that affects this is when the work gets done so that the object knows what has to be drawn. If update data is just stored when it changes and the calculations for redrawing don’t happen until the object actually redraws itself, then the impact of hidden GUI objects should be negligible.

#140628
Jul 9, 2012 at 11:03pm

Thanks dhjdhjdhj, I think you are saying ‘it shouldn’t matter al long as the UI object is not in any open window’ right?

#140629
Jul 9, 2012 at 11:10pm

IF they implemented UI objects this way THEN it shouldn’t matter.

#140630
Jul 10, 2012 at 12:15am

Turn on the metro and look at CPU use in Task Manager or Activity Monitor with the patch below.

Then encapsulate all the buttons

– Pasted Max Patch, click to expand. –
#140631
Jul 10, 2012 at 10:47am

Nuff said! Thanks Andrew, that is superclear.

#140632
Jul 10, 2012 at 11:44pm

by the way Andrew, is there no way to have a look at Max’s non audio object cpu utilization from within MaxMSP ? If not, is there a specific reason as to why ?

#140633

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.