davidestevens

Does anyone know of a UB (ie MacIntel) equivalent to Vround?

"Vround calculates the integer nearest to the value given (either a 

"Vround calculates the integer nearest to the value given (either a  
list or a single number)."

vround-replacement

request=round&operateur=AND&id_plateforme=UB&Submit=OK

http://www.maxobjects.com/? 
request=round&operateur=AND&id_plateforme=UB&Submit=OK

www.maxobjects.com
http://mathieu.chamagne.free.fr

Nice - thanks. I didn't know you could do that.

On 27 Mar 2007, at 14:33, jeanfrancois.charles wrote:

> The following is a version working only with positive numbers:

> The following is a version working only with positive numbers:
>


Indeed. I have no idea why I didn't use Lround in the first place, 

given that I've been using the LObjects for years.

On 27 Mar 2007, at 14:48, mathieu.chamagne@gmail.com wrote:

> request=round&operateur=AND&id_plateforme=UB&Submit=OK

Indeed. I have no idea why I didn't use Lround in the first place,  
given that I've been using the LObjects for years.
Hey ho.

> http://www.maxobjects.com/? 
> request=round&operateur=AND&id_plateforme=UB&Submit=OK
>
> round
> Lround
> f0.round
> roundto
> ...
>
> www.maxobjects.com
> http://mathieu.chamagne.free.fr
>
>


> Does anyone know of a UB (ie MacIntel) equivalent to Vround?

> General advice: try not to use externals when you can use a simple 

> abstraction. The following is a version working only with positive

If you have an old patch with that external you'd rather try to mimic it 

completely, Vround will also accept symbols within the list...

(it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround doesn't

come up fast enough it will do it as well... ;-)

David Stevens schrieb:
> Does anyone know of a UB (ie MacIntel) equivalent to Vround?

jeanfrancois.charles schrieb:
> General advice: try not to use externals when you can use a simple 
> abstraction. The following is a version working only with positive
> numbers:

If you have an old patch with that external you'd rather try to mimic it 
completely, Vround will also accept symbols within the list...

Try this as abhaXion...
(it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround doesn't
come up fast enough it will do it as well... ;-)

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


> (it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround doesn't

> come up fast enough it will do it as well... ;-)

It's a great one, indeed. Seems also compatible with the 4X.

> Try this as abhaXion...
> (it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround doesn't
> come up fast enough it will do it as well... ;-)

It's a great one, indeed. Seems also compatible with the 4X.


On 28 Mar 2007, at 11:54, Stefan Tiedje wrote:

>> Does anyone know of a UB (ie MacIntel) equivalent to Vround?

>> General advice: try not to use externals when you can use a simple 

>> abstraction. The following is a version working only with positive

> If you have an old patch with that external you'd rather try to 

> mimic it completely, Vround will also accept symbols within the 

> (it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround 

> David Stevens schrieb:
>> Does anyone know of a UB (ie MacIntel) equivalent to Vround?
>
> jeanfrancois.charles schrieb:
>> General advice: try not to use externals when you can use a simple  
>> abstraction. The following is a version working only with positive
>> numbers:
>
> If you have an old patch with that external you'd rather try to  
> mimic it completely, Vround will also accept symbols within the  
> list...
>
> Try this as abhaXion...
> (it would even run in Windows and if the sparc version of lround  
> doesn't
> come up fast enough it will do it as well... ;-)


Vround replacement?