My files are 1366 X 768 and my old(hum!) PowerBook labors.

I noticed to uncheck the "use onscreen" mode in jit.pwindow and ask me if there are others ticks to improve the fluidity of scrolling with jit.qt.movie ? ( except buy a MacPro :-) )

I thought about remake my jitter patch in JS, 

I also tryed gem lib, but features are not the same .

I thought about remake my jitter patch in JS, would it be less glutton in CPU use ?

which-way-to-improve-the-use-of-jit-qt-movie

+add "unique 1" to adapt the metro to your movies framerate

> My files are 1366 X 768 and my old(hum!) PowerBook labors.

> I noticed to uncheck the "use onscreen" mode in jit.pwindow and ask me if

> there are others ticks to improve the fluidity of scrolling with

> jit.qt.movie ? ( except buy a MacPro :-) )

> I thought about remake my jitter patch in JS, 

> I also tryed gem lib, but features are not the same .

+add "unique 1" to adapt the metro to your movies framerate
lower your movie resolution.

On 3/16/07, derrickgiscloux  wrote:
>
>
> Hi list !
>
> My files are 1366 X 768 and my old(hum!) PowerBook labors.
>
> I noticed to uncheck the "use onscreen" mode in jit.pwindow and ask me if
> there are others ticks to improve the fluidity of scrolling with
> jit.qt.movie ? ( except buy a MacPro :-) )
>
> I thought about remake my jitter patch in JS, would it be less glutton
> in CPU use ?
>
> I also tryed gem lib, but features are not the same .
>
> tthanksssss
>
> Derrick.
>

My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)

My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)
Not very nervous isn't it ?


I haven't ever used a Radeon 9600 but it is right on the edge of

having good texture and shader support. You can eek out performance

from reading large movies by choosing a proper codec that reduces the

amount of calculation needed to decompress a frame of video. MJPEG

Good quality is a popular choice. You can also use uyuv mode to halve

your bandwidth and display it on a videoplane with a uyvy texture.

> My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)

I haven't ever used a Radeon 9600 but it is right on the edge of
having good texture and shader support.  You can eek out performance
from reading large movies by choosing a proper codec that reduces the
amount of calculation needed to decompress a frame of video.  MJPEG
Good quality is a popular choice.  You can also use uyuv mode to halve
your bandwidth and display it on a videoplane with a uyvy texture.

On 3/16/07, derrickgiscloux  wrote:
>
> My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)
> Not very nervous isn't it ?
>


there was a thread about opengl panorama scrolling way back. search for it.

codec is very importent, if you need alpha in your movie, try the animation

one, its heavy on the disk but takes less CPU to decompress. photojpeg is

another variant of the mjpeg family which i use.

if all else fails, try halving your movie size and up sample it in jitter.

slight stuttering with moving videoplanes is a pain, especially with high

> I haven't ever used a Radeon 9600 but it is right on the edge of

> having good texture and shader support. You can eek out performance

> from reading large movies by choosing a proper codec that reduces the

> amount of calculation needed to decompress a frame of video. MJPEG

> Good quality is a popular choice. You can also use uyuv mode to halve

> your bandwidth and display it on a videoplane with a uyvy texture.

> > My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)

there was a thread about opengl panorama scrolling way back. search for it.
codec is very importent, if you need alpha in your movie, try the animation
one, its heavy on the disk  but takes less CPU to decompress. photojpeg is
another variant of the mjpeg family which i use.
if all else fails, try halving your movie size and up sample it in jitter.
slight stuttering with moving videoplanes is a pain, especially with high
res movies. i know how you feel.

On 3/16/07, Wesley Smith  wrote:
>
> I haven't ever used a Radeon 9600 but it is right on the edge of
> having good texture and shader support.  You can eek out performance
> from reading large movies by choosing a proper codec that reduces the
> amount of calculation needed to decompress a frame of video.  MJPEG
> Good quality is a popular choice.  You can also use uyuv mode to halve
> your bandwidth and display it on a videoplane with a uyvy texture.
>
> HTH,
> wes
>
> On 3/16/07, derrickgiscloux  wrote:
> >
> > My graphic card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 (Vram 64 Mo)
> > Not very nervous isn't it ?
> >
>

which way to improve the use of jit.qt.movie ?