<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"

			>

	<channel>
		<title>Cycling 74  &#187;  Topic: Wish: more Live.API &quot;done&quot; messages</title>
		<atom:link href="http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/feed</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=2.2.4</generator>
		<language></language>

		
														
					
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-48017</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Wish: more Live.API &quot;done&quot; messages]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-48017</link>
					<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Olivier Sebillotte</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>hi,<br />
ok, I hope you understand what I tried to describe there :</p>
<p>As it turns out that the live.API request answering timing could fluctuate in very large amount depending on the complexity and number of m4l devices, I really would like to have some ways to know When the the answer is complete.<br />
AFAIK , there is only one request who sends a &#8220;done&#8221; when complete: &#8220;getinfo&#8221;<br />
I wish I could have such a message when I ask for the devices on track or their parameters.<br />
So it will be possible to build a reliable cascade scheme of requests.<br />
So far I use some [delay] to &#8220;secure&#8221; things but I really don&#8217;t like this.</p>
<p>Does this makes sense ?</p>
<p>Thx<br />
Olivier</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-172688</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Wish: more Live.API &#8220;done&#8221; messages]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-172688</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Guillaume Evrard</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>hi Olivier,</p>
<p>one workaround could be to use a live.observer observing the property you change for the live.object. when the value is updated by the observer in the patch, it means &#8220;done&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>g</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

			
				<item>
					<guid>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-172689</guid>
					<title><![CDATA[Re: Wish: more Live.API &#8220;done&#8221; messages]]></title>
					<link>http://cycling74.com/forums/topic/wish-more-live-api-done-messages/#post-172689</link>
					<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
					<dc:creator>Julien Bayle</dc:creator>

					<description>
						<![CDATA[
						<p>critical real-time things should be done differently&#8230; by reading you.<br />
I mean: if you need a kind of &#8220;done&#8221; message, it probably means cpu has a lot of things to do. So, in order to have this &#8220;done&#8221; message, you want to build another &#8220;system&#8221; that handles the completeness of processes to inform you with &#8220;done&#8221; messages&#8230;<br />
so cpu would have more work to do&#8230;</p>
<p>it doesn&#8217;t make sense for me :P</p>
<p>I&#8217;d choose another way&#8230;</p>
						]]>
					</description>

					
					
				</item>

					
		
	</channel>
	</rss>

