Eric Sheffield

I'd like to scale the range of an LFO (currently from cycle~, though perhaps from other oscillators in the future) while keeping it in the signal domain. Just because some objects seem to like being fed modulation info as signals instead of events (for instance, a variable delay with tapin/tapout~).

This is easy to do with snapshot~ than zmap, but is there a way to do this without leaving the signal domain?

I'd like to set a RANGE (i.e. 500-1300) rather than just a maximum, which is what multiplying the output from a cycle~ object would do (i.e. 0-1300).

I've tried a combination of +~ and *~, but that makes my maximum inaccurate.

Maybe this isn't that hard, but I jest can't think of it right now. Any suggestions?

Here's an example of what I've got so far:

Hello, all.
I'd like to scale the range of an LFO (currently from cycle~, though perhaps from other oscillators in the future) while keeping it in the signal domain.  Just because some objects seem to like being fed modulation info as signals instead of events (for instance, a variable delay with tapin/tapout~).
This is easy to do with snapshot~ than zmap, but is there a way to do this without leaving the signal domain?
I'd like to set a RANGE (i.e. 500-1300) rather than just a maximum, which is what multiplying the output from a cycle~ object would do (i.e. 0-1300).
I've tried a combination of +~ and *~, but that makes my maximum inaccurate.
Maybe this isn't that hard, but I jest can't think of it right now.  Any suggestions?
Here's an example of what I've got so far:

zmap-like-function-for-signal

On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:59 PM, Eric Sheffield wrote:

> I'd like to set a RANGE (i.e. 500-1300) rather than just a maximum, 

> which is what multiplying the output from a cycle~ object would do 

> I'd like to set a RANGE (i.e. 500-1300) rather than just a maximum,  
> which is what multiplying the output from a cycle~ object would do  
> (i.e. 0-1300).

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com

Quote: mopppish wrote on Tue, 10 June 2008 04:59

----------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to scale the range of an LFO (currently from cycle~, though perhaps from other oscillators in the future) while keeping it in the signal domain. 

lp.scamp~ does everything zmap does (and more), all in the signal domain.

Quote: mopppish wrote on Tue, 10 June 2008 04:59
----------------------------------------------------
> I'd like to scale the range of an LFO (currently from cycle~, though perhaps from other oscillators in the future) while keeping it in the signal domain.  
----------------------------------------------------

zmap-like function for signal?