Blackmagic DeckLink HD card + Jitter?


    Mar 14 2006 | 6:54 pm
    Hi,
    I know some of you have these in your machines, I was wondering if you could shed some light on their usage w/r/t Jitter.
    Is it easy to bring the card's foootage into Max? Like as easy as using qt.grab, or is there somehting else needed?
    Is there any latency involved (with the 4:4:4 model)?
    Are there any hints/ tips/ things to watch out for when using these cards?
    and, from a purely crazy talk perspective : anyone with these cards do realtime compositing with gl.slab and the hd input?
    thanks in advance, and sorry if some of these questions have been addressed in more detail than my cursory searches revealed.
    ~scott

    • Mar 14 2006 | 7:23 pm
      The decklink cards dont have hardware GL.. so doing openGL output on them is slow - software mode..
      I dont have one, but I picked that up from the list.
      v a d e //
      www.vade.info abstrakt.vade.info
      I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE! I LIVE!
      You will not be saved by the Holy Ghost. You will not be saved by the God Plutonium.
      In fact, YOU WILL NOT BE SAVED!
    • Mar 14 2006 | 7:37 pm
      well, i'd be using the built-in nvidia card for that render poop. the deckling would just be for capturing purposes.
      the poorly phrased question was about using shaders on hd footage. and if there was any sort of discernable hit vs standard def.
    • Mar 14 2006 | 7:52 pm
      On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Scott Fitzgerald wrote:
      > well, i'd be using the built-in nvidia card for that render poop. the > deckling would just be for capturing purposes. > > the poorly phrased question was about using shaders on hd footage. and > if there was any sort of discernable hit vs standard def.
      Provided you have a decent GPU (NVidia 6800, ATI X800 or better), bandwidth is going to be your biggest bottleneck.
      On a Dual 2.5 GHz G5 we've been able to decode 2 1280x720 uyvy Phtot JPEG streams from disk and composite with shaders with room for additional shader processing maintaining more than 30fps. And a single 1920x1080 stream with a handful of shader based post processing @ 30fps. Coming uncompressed might be even faster if the PCI slots are fast enough.
      Let us know your findings.
      -Joshua
    • Mar 14 2006 | 9:10 pm
      On a somewhat slower G5, I'm doing 2-4 streams (depending on codec) at 1280x720 (h.264 jpeg or yuv - ordered from most to least costly) with compositing & effects (approximately 12 instances of jit.gl.slab) single stream 1080i works too. there is probably room on the gpu for more. read/decompression seems to be my bottleneck on the slower cpu, Dual 2.0 G5, ATI x800, 3 disk sata)
      -deKam
    • Mar 15 2006 | 3:21 am
      thanks everyone.
      i'll let y'all know how it turns out, though it sounds like everything will work out well.
      ~s