colls: testing for equality


    Aug 21 2008 | 11:35 am
    Before I code one myself, just checking: does anyone know of an
    object or abstraction that compares two colls for equality of content?
    Thanks,
    Dan
    --
    Dan Nigrin - Defective Records
    202 Hack / PC-1600 User / VSTi Host / Jack OS X / Major Malfunction
    http://defectiverecords.com

    • Aug 22 2008 | 7:51 am
      Dan Nigrin schrieb:
      > Before I code one myself, just checking: does anyone know of an object
      > or abstraction that compares two colls for equality of content?
      Data or index and data? If its only data, and the size isn't too big,
      I'd dump them into a list and zl compare them. Something like this:
      --
      Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
      --_____-----------|--------------
      --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
      -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
      ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
    • Aug 22 2008 | 12:56 pm
      At 9:51 AM +0200 8/22/08, Stefan Tiedje wrote:
      >Dan Nigrin schrieb:
      >>Before I code one myself, just checking: does anyone know of an
      >>object or abstraction that compares two colls for equality of
      >>content?
      >
      >Data or index and data? If its only data, and the size isn't too
      >big, I'd dump them into a list and zl compare them. Something like
      >this:
      Data only - that's very nice Stefan, thank you! The idea is much
      cleaner than the one I wrote yesterday (where I first compared the
      lengths, and if equal, then went element by element comparing them to
      each other).
      There was a couple of little bugs that I've fixed, and I've also made
      it so that you can just send it a list of two coll names in its
      inlet, for easier encapsulation:
      --
      Dan Nigrin - Defective Records
      202 Hack / PC-1600 User / VSTi Host / Jack OS X / Major Malfunction
      http://defectiverecords.com
    • Aug 24 2008 | 6:22 pm
      Dan Nigrin schrieb:
      > There was a couple of little bugs that I've fixed, and I've also made it
      > so that you can just send it a list of two coll names in its inlet, for
      > easier encapsulation:
      doesn't banging zl group work? Then you could get rid of the gates:
      --
      Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
      --_____-----------|--------------
      --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
      -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
      ----------()--------www.ccmix.com
    • Aug 25 2008 | 11:58 pm
      Yeah, you're right - much cleaner!
      Thanks,
      Dan
      At 8:22 PM +0200 8/24/08, Stefan Tiedje wrote:
      >Dan Nigrin schrieb:
      >>There was a couple of little bugs that I've fixed, and I've also
      >>made it so that you can just send it a list of two coll names in
      >>its inlet, for easier encapsulation:
      >
      >doesn't banging zl group work? Then you could get rid of the gates:
      --
      Dan Nigrin
      Defective Records
      202 Hack / PC-1600 User / VSTi Host / OMS Convert / Jack OS X / Major
      Malfunction
      http://www.defectiverecords.com