external & folders


    Jun 28 2006 | 7:57 am
    I'm cleaning my max folders and wonder : efficiency (loading) will be
    the same if i move my third party externals from the c74 folder to
    another one ?
    f.e
    --
    f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music
    > >>>>>> http://www.personal-computer-music.com
    > >>>>>> |sublime music for a desperate people|

    • Jun 28 2006 | 11:29 am
    • Jun 28 2006 | 12:00 pm
      As I've requested before, I would desperately like to see proof of
      this silly assertion. The MaxMSP Installer has never eaten my 3rd
      party objects (or any other data, for that matter), and I'm willing
      to bet the weight of those books in beer that I run those installers
      a lot more often than you do.
      jb
    • Jun 28 2006 | 12:26 pm
      I made a foler in my externals folder, and called it "3rd_party" - i
      keep all 3rd party (!!!) externals there. I do it on all my macs,
      never had a problem.
      as for windows i just sold my win machine, so i don't know
      best
      kasper
      --
      Kasper T. Toeplitz
      noise, composition, bass, computer
    • Jun 28 2006 | 1:28 pm
      Thanks, Peter, i've done that. I wanted to do it since a loooooong time
      but was a little affraid of changing my habits. The worse was to decide
      how to organize things : libraries, patches, externals, help files...
      I've decided to keep every help files close to its external or
      abstraction, then made an external folder for non-lib & non-abstractions
      files (bonk, fiddle, netsend~, even hr.externs which, after 10" i've
      decided not to consider as a library), a lib folder for lib (yes), and a
      patches folder for everything else (from max list txt files to MMNS2004,
      and so on...). + a Dev folder & a Java one. JS ? not sure... Now it's so
      clean :-)
      A question i have in my mind since i'm maxing : could we manually add
      other search paths in the txt file if the allowed ones are full ?
      cheers
      f.e
      f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music
    • Jun 28 2006 | 2:19 pm
      I really have had messages from Litter Power users who lost objects
      in an Max/MSP update. Grepping through old mail, this seems not to
      have been an issue since 4.5.1, but between 4.2 and 4.5.0 it did
      happen. Happened to me once, too.
      I won't provide "proof" in the form of names, copied email, or the
      like. Personal mail is personal mail. But I modified the Litter
      install instructions from "copy to your externals folder" to "put an
      alias into your externals folder" precisely because of unfortunate
      experiences. FWIW, that mod was made Jan 2004.
      If current installers don't clear out the externals and patches
      folders, that's as it should be. Whether future installers will
      exhibit the same behavior is something in the hands of the gods (ie,
      whomever provides the Installer software and whomever sets the
      Install preferences at Cycling '74). I can't control that. I *can*
      control where I put my externals.
      Once burnt twice cautious.
      Any comments on f.e's efficiency concerns?
      --
      "Never trust anything that can think for itself if you can't see
      where it keeps its brain..."
    • Jun 28 2006 | 3:30 pm
      On 28-Jun-2006, at 15:28, f.e wrote:
      > The worse was to decide how to organize things : libraries,
      > patches, externals, help files...
      There are lots of ways to do this, I don't think there is any one
      "best" solution. Whatever works for you.
      > I've decided to keep every help files close to its external or
      > abstraction,
      Makes sense. I recently "discovered" that Max traverses the entire
      search path when looking for .help files. For some reason I thought
      it only looked in max-help, but I guess I guessed wrong. I tried this
      on Mac OS, presumably it also works on Windows. So you should be able
      to organize .help files however you want.
      > A question i have in my mind since i'm maxing : could we manually
      > add other search paths in the txt file if the allowed ones are full ?
      Should work. '; max paths' and filepath can handle more "slots" than
      the File Prefs window. Check out the Messages to Max chapter.
      Filepath.help says up to 256 slots.
      Happy Housekeeping -- P.
      -------------- http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/ -------------
      Peter Castine +--> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter
      iCE: Sequencing, Recording & |home | chez nous|
      Interface Building for |bei uns | i nostri|
      Max/MSP Extremely cool http://www.castine.de
    • Jun 28 2006 | 4:06 pm
      this has been an important issue to me in the past. it could use
      some documentation because people seem to have varying outlooks on
      it. so it could use some official documentation. something that
      says "if you listen to every readme, your cycling folder will end up
      looking like your parents hard drive" er... I mean... it'll get messy
      -matt
    • Jun 29 2006 | 8:38 am
      i put all my custom folders in the max app folder (it
      could be any other folder of cour choice) and then select
      only the main folder to the search path.
    • Jun 29 2006 | 2:36 pm
      I keep all my 3rd party externals in E:maxmsp__externals , including betas from the incremental update wiki :D having 2 versions of uzi, one in the c74 folder and one in the search path, the search path one takes the cake which is cool.. meaning I don't have to replace objects. I can just leave things be.