I'm not sure this is necessarily "judicious", but I generally prefer my SVF filters in stereo - so I made a few alterations to combine the 4-outlet and the Bell together. And I never turn my filters "off," so....
(oh yeah - I'm not protecting anyone against changes in amplitude when you choose the Bell outlet. Just sayin'. :-) )
And, like the rest of you, I raise my virtual pint to toast the health and well-being of the stkrmonster.
My other reliable testbed is running 6.0.8, so I can't comment you your system. I've identified the specific circumstances under which a working patch - when transferred from 6.1.0 to 6.0.8. creates the spectacular crash you describe. I'm looking into it, but it might turn out to be something that was *fixed* in 6.1. and the fix allows it to run, in which case you may need to be patient. I'll let you know.
@gregory, thanks for additions. i will make a cpu saving multiple filters version at some stage, too.
@peter, i was hoping you'd turn up. it turns out it is very difficult to try and add the saturation etc characteristics of the Beat Frei paper to this svf. or at least i am finding it hard! will continue hacking away, but if you have any thoughts...
@oli, thanks so much for that collection of filters. i am upset i missed them when you first posted. they are fantastic, and i am pouring over them now.
p.s. @roger, i think you'll need at least 6.0.7 or later for this filter to work anyway, although i could be wrong.
Thank you also. Filter works on Max 6.1.1, but when clicking link I get 'no launchbrowser object' messsage, which isn't that important, but as you may not know, and it's really good work, this is for FYI:)
Just wondering, how does the licensing work for this kind of thing in a commercial application. Is the svf filter white paper in the public domain? Can we use this gen example in a commercial app freely, without licensing it?
Part of the activity of creating commercial applications involves figuring that stuff out, which means it's time for a little research on your part. Doing that research yourself and getting a legal opinion rather than relying on hearsay is a good idea, since it's your liability at stake. To mangle Samuel Johnson, "The prospect of litigation wonderfully concentrates the mind." :-)
I did get a little curious about the matter. This should give you a few directions to proceed, courtesy of Mr. Simper [whose filter code this appears to be] himself. If it's indistinguishable or qualitatively similar to the Chamberlain, then....
You're too late, Greggy boy. People far nastier than one might possibly imagine ever a woman's womb couldeth have made already purloined every good idea or thing I ever had, the number of which are far beyond surmise. Including my wife, by one of the Google founders. That be the reason for my comment there. You have a wonderful day.