groove~ bug?


    Oct 20 2006 | 9:41 pm
    can someone follow the directions in this patch and see if it behaves the same for you? I am using a 2 sec file and a 55 sec file to test it I looked for this in the archives but didn't find anything...sorry if it's a known issue KIM ======================

    • Oct 20 2006 | 10:32 pm
    • Oct 20 2006 | 11:26 pm
      >can someone follow the directions in this patch and see if it behaves >the same for you? >I am using a 2 sec file and a 55 sec file to test it >I looked for this in the archives but didn't find anything...sorry if >it's a known issue
      Strange! Here it behaves as expected ONLY the first time i switch from the shorter to the longer file, if i repeat the procedure i experience the described behavior. MaxMSP 4.5.7 OSX 10.4.8 PowerBook G4 1.33 GHz. Test done with short files of around 0.5 - 2 sec and longer files around 20 - 30 sec.
      /J
    • Oct 20 2006 | 11:47 pm
      Hmmm, that seems to be a bit odd.
      We'll look into it a bit more - yes, I think it should work like you'd think it would, but in the meantime....
    • Oct 21 2006 | 1:17 am
      On Oct 20, 2006, at 4:47 PM, Andrew Pask wrote:
      > Hmmm, that seems to be a bit odd. > > We'll look into it a bit more - yes, I think it should work like > you'd think it would, but in the meantime.... thanks Andrew! I thought it might be cleaner to have groove~ send a bang at the end of file load rather than using the total time from the info~ object here's my workaround:
    • Oct 21 2006 | 1:22 am
      I was able to replicate Kim's odd groove~ behaviour, but noticed that groove~ corrects itself if I'm fiddeling with I/O vector size, for whatever reason (winXP 1.7Mhz, max 4.5.1).
      now how's that for QA? Zax ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Pask" To: Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:47 AM Subject: [maxmsp] Re: groove~ bug?
      > > > > Hmmm, that seems to be a bit odd. > > We'll look into it a bit more - yes, I think it should work like you'd > think it would, but in the meantime.... > > #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 9.; > #P window linecount 1; > #P newex 220 364 19 9109513 t b; > #P window linecount 4; > #P comment 54 184 93 9109513 buffer is being resized to soundfile length > via 'replace' command; > #P window linecount 1; > #P comment 470 374 26 9109513 > #P window linecount 4; > #P comment 498 397 100 9109513 5. the file plays as it should -- groove > adjusts to the proper length; > #P window linecount 2; > #P comment 498 370 100 9109513 4. hit the [set fookim] message box; > #P window linecount 3; > #P comment 498 331 100 9109513 3. notice the file is played back as if it > were the shorter file; > #P comment 498 292 93 9109513 2. drop much longer soundfile on droppanel; > #P user multiSlider 414 449 76 19 0. 1. 1 2936 15 0 0 2 0 0 0; > #M frgb 214 0 46; > #M brgb 247 232 1; > #M rgb2 127 127 127; > #M rgb3 0 0 0; > #M rgb4 37 52 91; > #M rgb5 74 105 182; > #M rgb6 112 158 18; > #M rgb7 149 211 110; > #M rgb8 187 9 201; > #M rgb9 224 62 37; > #M rgb10 7 114 128; > #P window linecount 1; > #P newex 198 449 81 9109513 loadmess loop 1; > #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 12.; > #P window linecount 3; > #P comment 133 57 52 9109516 Drop Panel fookim; > #P window linecount 1; > #P comment 173 145 35 9109516 Sec; > #P flonum 106 143 67 12 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0; > #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 9.; > #P newex 240 335 50 9109513 / 1000.; > #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 12.; > #P message 379 144 195 9109516 Harpo-01.wav; > #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 9.; > #P newex 347 336 69 9109513 prepend set; > #P newex 251 303 105 9109513 info~ fookim; > #P user dropfile 103 38 560 164 0; > #P newex 184 275 77 9109513 buffer~ fookim; > #P newex 184 186 85 9109513 prepend replace; > #P user panel 104 40 455 125; > #X brgb 207 255 252; > #X frgb 0 0 0; > #X border 1; > #X rounded 0; > #X shadow 0; > #X done; > #P message 207 403 57 9109513 set fookim; > #P message 368 385 14 9109513 0; > #P message 350 385 14 9109513 1; > #P newex 336 435 29 9109513 sig~; > #P newex 321 562 49 9109513 *~ 0.3; > #P newex 279 562 41 9109513 *~ 0.3; > #P hidden newex 412 493 70 9109513 snapshot~ 50; > #P user number~ 414 467 490 482 9 139 3 2 0. 0. 0 0. 250 0. 0 0 0 221 221 > 221 222 222 222 0 0 0; > #P comment 419 436 71 9109513 loop position1; > #P newex 278 530 89 9109513 groove~ fookim 2; > #P button 279 404 15 0; > #P message 279 423 14 9109513 0; > #P message 233 560 29 9109513 stop; > #P message 165 560 67 9109513 startwindow; > #P newex 279 598 31 9109513 dac~; > #P window linecount 3; > #P comment 498 254 93 9109513 1. drop short soundfile on droppanel; > #P connect 35 0 15 0; > #P hidden connect 23 0 24 0; > #P connect 23 0 35 0; > #P connect 17 0 18 0; > #P hidden connect 6 2 9 0; > #P hidden connect 6 2 8 0; > #P hidden connect 9 0 28 0; > #P hidden fasten 21 0 22 0 352 360 384 360; > #P fasten 20 7 21 0 347 327 352 327; > #P connect 13 0 12 0; > #P connect 14 0 12 0; > #P connect 6 1 11 0; > #P connect 11 0 1 1; > #P fasten 2 0 1 0 170 584 284 584; > #P fasten 3 0 1 0 238 585 284 585; > #P connect 10 0 1 0; > #P connect 6 0 10 0; > #P connect 5 0 4 0; > #P fasten 12 0 6 0 341 491 283 491; > #P connect 15 0 6 0; > #P fasten 27 0 6 0 203 487 283 487; > #P connect 4 0 6 0; > #P fasten 18 1 20 0 256 297 256 297; > #P fasten 20 6 23 0 334 326 245 326; > #P hidden fasten 19 0 17 0 108 175 189 175; > #P window clipboard copycount 36; > >
    • Oct 21 2006 | 1:37 am
      On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Kim Cascone wrote: > here's my workaround
      Kim: I can confirm your behavior. Thought I would also chime in since my name came up.
      I have experience several instances of buffers behaving badly since upgrading to 4.6 and a MacIntel. It's the reason the UB GTK has not been released. I am trying to track things down.
      Andrew: If you find something in the buffer code, PLEASE let me know.
      ----- Nathan Wolek nw@nathanwolek.com http://www.nathanwolek.com
    • Oct 21 2006 | 1:51 am
      Nathan I should mention that my config is as follows:
      OS X 10.4.8 G4 PB 1.67GHz ========= Max/MSP 4.6.2 Jitter 1.6.2 Pluggo 3.6.0
      and that I'm looking forward to getting the GTK externals back in Max! :)
      and nice work Eran on the I/O Vector size interaction! :) ...I haven't fiddled with that yet but my settings are 512=I/O Vector; 256=Signal Vector
      On Oct 20, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nathan Wolek wrote:
      > On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Kim Cascone wrote: >> here's my workaround > > Kim: I can confirm your behavior. Thought I would also chime in > since my name came up. > > I have experience several instances of buffers behaving badly since > upgrading to 4.6 and a MacIntel. It's the reason the UB GTK has > not been released. I am trying to track things down. > > Andrew: If you find something in the buffer code, PLEASE let me know. > > ----- > Nathan Wolek > nw@nathanwolek.com > http://www.nathanwolek.com >
    • Oct 24 2006 | 12:53 am
      hi everybody,
      I haven't received any list emails (maxmsp or jitter) in the last two days. what's up? the online forum shows plenty of new posts, and my profile on the c74 site says I have email subscriptions to the lists.....
      uh, help maybe??
      thanks
      b
    • Oct 24 2006 | 8:02 am
      This has happened to me a few of times and it's usually been down to an over-enthusiastic spam filter. Try using web-mail instead of your usual client; you may well find your spam filter has taken upon itself to consider evrything from [maxmsp] as spam, in which case it will need re-educating, cheers Roger
      --- billy gomberg wrote:
      > hi everybody, > > I haven't received any list emails (maxmsp or > jitter) in the last two > days. what's up? the online forum shows plenty of > new posts, and my > profile on the c74 site says I have email > subscriptions to the > lists..... > > uh, help maybe?? > > thanks > > b >
    • Oct 27 2006 | 5:19 am
      ROGER CARRUTHERS wrote: > This has happened to me a few of times and it's > usually been down to an over-enthusiastic spam filter. > Try using web-mail instead of your usual client; you > may well find your spam filter has taken upon itself > to consider evrything from [maxmsp] as spam, in which > case it will need re-educating,
      Web mail is the most annoying thing on earth I can imagine... Better change your provider if you can't switch off the server based filters... But usually you should only have to add the lists to your addressbook...
      Stefan
      -- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com