gtk & gverb UB


    Nov 29 2006 | 4:28 pm
    I have posted Universal Binary updates for my granular toolkit and gverb~ externals.
    The GTK stuff is the externals ONLY at this time. I am in the midst of adding new features to the abstractions for a 1.5 update (poly~ & pattr anyone?), but that is taking longer than expected. In the meantime, people can enjoy the MXO-updated externals. And if you download the older abstractions, they will work with the new externals.
    Also, my hosting service seems to have issues with dmg files. The temporary solution is to control-click on the link and choose your "Save Linked File" option. I have an email in to tech support.
    [gverb~] has some efficiency updates and now runs at about 2% on my 2 GHz MacBook Pro. Not bad if I may say so. Please email me with any issues. Enjoy!
    ----- Nathan Wolek nw@nathanwolek.com http://www.nathanwolek.com

    • Nov 29 2006 | 7:03 pm
      On the download page, both the CFM and the winXP links point to the same file: gtk_1.10xp.zip. There should be a separate CFM package, no?
      Thanks!
      On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Nathan Wolek wrote:
      > I have posted Universal Binary updates for my granular toolkit and > gverb~ externals. > > http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/software.html >
      ---- Steven M. Miller
      Associate Professor of Contemporary Music College of Santa Fe Contemporary Music Program 1600 St. Michaels Drive Santa Fe NM 87505 http://pubweb.csf.edu/~smill (505) 473-6197
      SFIFEM Atrium Sound Space OVOS http://sfifem.csf.edu http://atrium.csf.edu http://pubweb.csf.edu/ ~smill/ovos.html
    • Nov 29 2006 | 8:27 pm
      On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Steven Miller wrote: > There should be a separate CFM package, no?
      Yes. It is fixed now. Thanks for spotting this!
      ----- Nathan Wolek nw@nathanwolek.com http://www.nathanwolek.com
    • Dec 02 2006 | 5:57 am
      Thanks Nathan, glad these will be around when I can finally afford to upgrade.
      -- Paul
      On 11/29/06, Nathan Wolek wrote: > On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Steven Miller wrote: > > There should be a separate CFM package, no? > > Yes. It is fixed now. Thanks for spotting this! > > ----- > Nathan Wolek > nw@nathanwolek.com > http://www.nathanwolek.com > >
      -- ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| -----