gtk & gverb UB


    Nov 29 2006 | 4:28 pm
    I have posted Universal Binary updates for my granular toolkit and
    gverb~ externals.
    The GTK stuff is the externals ONLY at this time. I am in the midst
    of adding new features to the abstractions for a 1.5 update (poly~ &
    pattr anyone?), but that is taking longer than expected. In the
    meantime, people can enjoy the MXO-updated externals. And if you
    download the older abstractions, they will work with the new externals.
    Also, my hosting service seems to have issues with dmg files. The
    temporary solution is to control-click on the link and choose your
    "Save Linked File" option. I have an email in to tech support.
    [gverb~] has some efficiency updates and now runs at about 2% on my 2
    GHz MacBook Pro. Not bad if I may say so. Please email me with any
    issues. Enjoy!
    -----
    Nathan Wolek
    nw@nathanwolek.com

    • Nov 29 2006 | 7:03 pm
      On the download page, both the CFM and the winXP links point to the
      same file: gtk_1.10xp.zip. There should be a separate CFM package, no?
      Thanks!
      On Nov 29, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Nathan Wolek wrote:
      > I have posted Universal Binary updates for my granular toolkit and
      > gverb~ externals.
      >
      > http://www.lowkeydigitalstudio.com/software.html
      >
      ----
      Steven M. Miller
      Associate Professor of Contemporary Music
      College of Santa Fe
      Contemporary Music Program
      1600 St. Michaels Drive
      Santa Fe NM 87505
      http://pubweb.csf.edu/~smill
      (505) 473-6197
      SFIFEM Atrium Sound Space OVOS
      http://sfifem.csf.edu http://atrium.csf.edu http://pubweb.csf.edu/
      ~smill/ovos.html
    • Nov 29 2006 | 8:27 pm
      On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Steven Miller wrote:
      > There should be a separate CFM package, no?
      Yes. It is fixed now. Thanks for spotting this!
      -----
      Nathan Wolek
      nw@nathanwolek.com
    • Dec 02 2006 | 5:57 am
      Thanks Nathan, glad these will be around when I can finally afford to upgrade.
      -- Paul
      On 11/29/06, Nathan Wolek wrote:
      > On Nov 29, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Steven Miller wrote:
      > > There should be a separate CFM package, no?
      >
      > Yes. It is fixed now. Thanks for spotting this!
      >
      > -----
      > Nathan Wolek
      > nw@nathanwolek.com
      > http://www.nathanwolek.com
      >
      >
      --
      ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| -----