including bpatchers - benefit?


    Feb 13 2007 | 10:34 am
    is there any difference - eventually even any benefit - when including bpatchers in the main patch before building applications or plug-ins?
    i assume regarding initialisation everything is the same but what about load times and what about arguments to bpatcher?
    and then i also fail to see what including could be good for as you can never edit it again. or can you?
    -110

    • Feb 13 2007 | 2:21 pm
      ... is it true that you voted 5 stars for your own message?
      Mattijs
    • Feb 13 2007 | 4:33 pm
    • Feb 14 2007 | 6:20 am
      Quote: Mattijs wrote on Tue, 13 February 2007 07:21 ---------------------------------------------------- > ... is it true that you voted 5 stars for your own message? > > Mattijs ----------------------------------------------------
      yes, funny isnt it?
      i am the only who knows this secret feature of the max forum so i can use it fine for marking my own posts. makes them easier to find in the list.
      -110 :P
    • Feb 14 2007 | 9:05 am
      yea, agree. it's funny that nobody uses this feature
      Quote: Roman Thilenius wrote on Wed, 14 February 2007 07:20 ---------------------------------------------------- > Quote: Mattijs wrote on Tue, 13 February 2007 07:21 > ---------------------------------------------------- > > ... is it true that you voted 5 stars for your own message? > > > > Mattijs > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > yes, funny isnt it? > > i am the only who knows this secret feature of the max forum > so i can use it fine for marking my own posts. > makes them easier to find in the list. > > > -110 :P > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------
    • Feb 14 2007 | 1:12 pm
      all patches are automatically included. I think all you need to include is dll, mxe, and, I dunno, something else maybe.