jit.cellblock problems/bugs


    Sep 28 2008 | 11:52 am
    1) jit.cellblock seems slow to respond in in-place edit mode especially when scrolling. i am using 600 columns though...but this probably isn't particularly large. it works fine in all other selection modes...
    if i open the patch below in with the jit.cellblock in in-place edit mode it crashes max unless i stick a deferlow in there.
    2) i am having a problem populating 600 cells with incrementing values from uzi - anomolous values are inserted towards 600. this happens nearly every time but not always...
    expected behaviour - cells in row 0 count from 0 to 600
    actual behaviour - cells count from 0 to nearly 600 then the values become a bit random...
    max 5 running on windows xp/1.66ghz dual core/2gb RAM
    patch to demonstrate

    • Sep 29 2008 | 3:56 am
      Great demo patch.
      The cells at the end aren't random - they are values missing from
      within the earlier count. Somehow, the set command is getting
      confused in this case - I'll have a look at it to see if I can track
      the problem down. Thanks for the report!
      [ddg]
      Darwin Grosse
      On Sep 28, 2008, at 5:52 AM, donovan sellings wrote:
      >
      > 1) jit.cellblock seems slow to respond in in-place edit mode
      > especially when scrolling. i am using 600 columns though...but this
      > probably isn't particularly large. it works fine in all other
      > selection modes...
      >
      > if i open the patch below in with the jit.cellblock in in-place edit
      > mode it crashes max unless i stick a deferlow in there.
      >
      > 2) i am having a problem populating 600 cells with incrementing
      > values from uzi - anomolous values are inserted towards 600. this
      > happens nearly every time but not always...
      >
      > expected behaviour - cells in row 0 count from 0 to 600
      >
      > actual behaviour - cells count from 0 to nearly 600 then the values
      > become a bit random...
      >
      >
      >
      > max 5 running on windows xp/1.66ghz dual core/2gb RAM
    • Sep 29 2008 | 9:05 am
      Darwin Grosse schrieb:
      > The cells at the end aren't random - they are values missing from within
      > the earlier count. Somehow, the set command is getting confused in this
      > case - I'll have a look at it to see if I can track the problem down.
      > Thanks for the report!
      To add and aid: On my PPC Powerbook it is actually fine, I couldn't
      encounter this problem, maybe its an intel/multiprocessor issue...
      Stefan
      --
      Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
      --_____-----------|--------------
      --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
      -- _|_)----|-----()--------------
      ----------()--------www.ccmix.com