Pitch Shift


    Mar 30 2008 | 10:56 am
    hey all. this is a question for all who mess with pitch shifting. everything
    i make has really bad artifacts in it. i'm trying to make one track that has
    some Good ( doesn't really have to be great) lowered vocals. ( i don't
    really have a low voice and i think it will add to the song) this is hip hop
    of sorts so it doesn't have to be terribly in tune to sound good. i just
    don't want the tinkles. have any of you messed with this? have anything you
    would be willing to show me? or perhaps a link to a good shifter? (
    MadShifta isn't good enough for what i want). Oh and at most it only has to
    go down about a major third to get what i want. just no tinkles :)
    anyway, any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated :)
    oh and it has been brought to my attention that i am a bad poster in that i
    never say thanks for the info. so i would like to take this time to thank
    everyone for any advice or help that i have ever gotten on this forum! THANK
    YOU :)
    -joel

    • Mar 30 2008 | 12:06 pm
    • Mar 30 2008 | 3:08 pm
      If you can handle a little latency, don't overlook gizmo~.
      -Joshua
    • Mar 30 2008 | 8:49 pm
      Seconded, I find gizmo~ very good usually.
      J-F.
      > If you can handle a little latency, don't overlook gizmo~.
      >
      > -Joshua
    • Mar 31 2008 | 1:55 am
      And if you can't, you can improve the quality by FFT convolving the
      original with the pitchshifted one to super impose the formants of the
      original on the shifted version. Tends to work better on material
      that has been pitchshifted upwards. Not as good as gizmo~, but can be
      faster.
      Also, consider using a high-shelf filter on the pitchshifted output to
      reduce the prominence of artifacts. (alternatively, you could use a
      multiband compressor)
      Peter McCulloch
    • Mar 31 2008 | 2:09 am
      good idea but the thing with cutting out the highs is that i do want some
      highs in the vox or it will not sound as alive.
      i'm gona mess with gizmo~ some more ( just got home from work) and this is
      just for production so latency is fine :)
      On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Peter McCulloch wrote:
      > And if you can't, you can improve the quality by FFT convolving the
      > original with the pitchshifted one to super impose the formants of the
      > original on the shifted version. Tends to work better on material
      > that has been pitchshifted upwards. Not as good as gizmo~, but can be
      > faster.
      >
      > Also, consider using a high-shelf filter on the pitchshifted output to
      > reduce the prominence of artifacts. (alternatively, you could use a
      > multiband compressor)
      >
      > Peter McCulloch
      >
      >
      >
    • Mar 31 2008 | 2:34 am
      i remember why i don't like gizmo~ all that much. it's exactly like
      Madshifta. it makes the "chuuck chuuck" noise with any kind of percussive
      noise your mouth might make. same thing it does with drums :( you guys know
      what im talking about? the chuuck chuuck
      On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Joel Swensen wrote:
      > good idea but the thing with cutting out the highs is that i do want some
      > highs in the vox or it will not sound as alive.
      > i'm gona mess with gizmo~ some more ( just got home from work) and this is
      > just for production so latency is fine :)
      >
      >
      > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Peter McCulloch <
      > peter.mcculloch@gmail.com> wrote:
      >
      > > And if you can't, you can improve the quality by FFT convolving the
      > > original with the pitchshifted one to super impose the formants of the
      > > original on the shifted version. Tends to work better on material
      > > that has been pitchshifted upwards. Not as good as gizmo~, but can be
      > > faster.
      > >
      > > Also, consider using a high-shelf filter on the pitchshifted output to
      > > reduce the prominence of artifacts. (alternatively, you could use a
      > > multiband compressor)
      > >
      > > Peter McCulloch
      > >
      > >
      > >
      >
      >
    • Apr 09 2008 | 10:18 pm
      and where do you get this Spear wonder?
      ron
      Joel Swensen wrote: nice, though i don't have the OSX yet. :( get my macbook in about 2 months :) all i have is this old old pc. it's on its last legs :(
      On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Kenneth Stewart wrote:
      Which OS are you?
      If you are on OS X, Spear is a great program for pitch shifting. It's an fft style process but when you get the settings right It is as simple as a drag to the new transposition level.
      ___________________________________________________________________________________Ron Alford
    • Apr 09 2008 | 10:37 pm
      www.klingbeil.com/spear/
      Cheers
      Gary Lee Nelson
      Oberlin College
      www.timara.oberlin.edu/GaryLeeNelson
      From: ronald alford
      Reply-To:
      Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
      To:
      Subject: Re: [maxmsp] Pitch Shift
      and where do you get this Spear wonder?
      ron
      Joel Swensen wrote:
      > nice, though i don't have the OSX yet. :( get my macbook in about 2 months :)
      > all i have is this old old pc. it's on its last legs :(
      >
      > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Kenneth Stewart wrote:
      >
      >> Which OS are you?
      >>
      >> If you are on OS X, Spear is a great program for pitch shifting. It's an fft
      >> style process but when you get the settings right It is as simple as a drag
      >> to the new transposition level.
      >>
      >>
      >
      _______
      Ron Alford