karolina

I'm new to Jitter and I was wondering if there is a better approach to 'nesting' metrices within a larger matrix than using jit.glue.

I would like to have a matrix made up of 'tiles'. these tiles would scale up and down according to luma value of imput movie (which will be pixelated, so that number of input cells will match the number of tiles in my main matrix).

I have made an example using jit.glue with just a 3x3 matrix, but ideally I would like it to be much larger, and jit.glue just seems like incredibly inefficient way of doing this.

I would really appreciate any suggestions.

Hello,
I'm new to Jitter and I was wondering if there is a better approach to 'nesting' metrices within a larger matrix than using jit.glue.  

I would like to have a matrix made up of 'tiles'.  these tiles would scale up and down according to luma value of imput movie (which will be pixelated, so that number of input cells will match the number of tiles in my main matrix).

I have made an example using jit.glue with just a 3x3 matrix, but ideally I would like it to be much larger, and jit.glue just seems like incredibly inefficient way of doing this.  

I would really appreciate any suggestions.
below is my example.
Karolina

better-way-of-nesting-metrices-than-glue

Look at the dstdimstart & dstdimend messages. Or better yet, chuck 

each matrix in a videoplane & do it all in GL

On Jan 31, 2008, at 18:58, karolina wrote:

> I'm new to Jitter and I was wondering if there is a better approach 

> to 'nesting' metrices within a larger matrix than using jit.glue.

> I would like to have a matrix made up of 'tiles'. these tiles would 

> scale up and down according to luma value of imput movie (which will 

> be pixelated, so that number of input cells will match the number of 

> I have made an example using jit.glue with just a 3x3 matrix, but 

> ideally I would like it to be much larger, and jit.glue just seems 

> like incredibly inefficient way of doing this.

Look at the dstdimstart & dstdimend messages.  Or better yet, chuck  
each matrix in a videoplane & do it all in GL

>
> Hello,
> I'm new to Jitter and I was wondering if there is a better approach  
> to 'nesting' metrices within a larger matrix than using jit.glue.
>
> I would like to have a matrix made up of 'tiles'.  these tiles would  
> scale up and down according to luma value of imput movie (which will  
> be pixelated, so that number of input cells will match the number of  
> tiles in my main matrix).
>
> I have made an example using jit.glue with just a 3x3 matrix, but  
> ideally I would like it to be much larger, and jit.glue just seems  
> like incredibly inefficient way of doing this.


better way of nesting metrices than glue?