zimmer

Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the buffer~ object without actually renaming the file name in the object? Or is there any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?

buffer-4

On Sep 12, 2008, at 1:15 PM, darren wrote:

> Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the 

> buffer~ object without actually renaming the file name in the 

> object? Or is there any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?

readagain message? (I'm not 100% sure what you're after here)

> Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the  
> buffer~ object without actually renaming the file name in the  
> object? Or is there any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com

By renaming the object do you mean sending the message "replace [/filepath/]" ?

You probably know you can load multiple buffers and use the "set

> On Sep 12, 2008, at 1:15 PM, darren wrote:

> > Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the buffer~

> object without actually renaming the file name in the object? Or is there

> any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?

> readagain message? (I'm not 100% sure what you're after here)

By renaming the object do you mean sending the message "replace [/filepath/]"  ?

You probably know you can load multiple buffers and use the "set
[this]" in some objects like groove~.

On 9/12/08, Chris Muir  wrote:
>
>  On Sep 12, 2008, at 1:15 PM, darren wrote:
>
>
> > Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the buffer~
> object without actually renaming the file name in the object? Or is there
> any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?
> >
>
>
>  readagain message? (I'm not 100% sure what you're after here)
>
>  Chris Muir
>  cbm@well.com
>  http://www.xfade.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head.

What i'm trying to do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be updated with the sound file as it changes.

Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head.
What i'm trying to do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be updated with the sound file as it changes.


"set" is a nice message. buffer likes it.

If you have the sound files in the same folder with your patch works fine.

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:15 PM, darren wrote:

> Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the buffer~

http://www.myspace.com/sophoklis_arvanitis

"set" is a nice message. buffer likes it.
If you have the sound files in the same folder with your patch works fine.
if this is an answer to your question.

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:15 PM, darren  wrote:

>
> Does anyone know is it possible to refresh a sound file in the buffer~
> object without actually renaming the file name in the object? Or is there
> any alternativw objects or methods for doing this?
>

-- 
http://www.myspace.com/sophoklis_arvanitis
http://www.essim.gr/

the buffer will not automatically be updated as it just copies the file 

to RAM when it receives the right message and wont care about any 

changes to the file afterwards. use record~ (or xrecord~ which is part 

> Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head.

> What i'm trying to do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be updated with the sound file as it changes.

the buffer will not automatically be updated as it just copies the file 
to RAM when it receives the right message and wont care about any 
changes to the file afterwards. use record~ (or xrecord~ which is part 
of xsample from http://grrrr.org/ext/beta/max/)

darren wrote:
> Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head.
> What i'm trying to do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be updated with the sound file as it changes.
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
http://pure.test.at
http://www.myspace.com/pvre
http://www.heartchamberorchestra.org
http://www.trblnc.org


I'd use a record~/ buffer~ combination, if I'd like to update recording. You can check also Buffer~ reference for some messages to export or modify.

Also using record~ in loop mode may help you.

I hope I didn't misunderstand your problem :)

> Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head. What i'm trying to

> do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it

> under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i

> rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be

> updated with the sound file as it changes.

Why not recording with record~ directly into the buffer~ and then saving 

But still, you can trigger in the moment you stop recording into 

darren schrieb:
> Sorry if that didn't make sense it did in my head. What i'm trying to
> do is record something in my patch (using sfrecord~ ) and save it
> under the same name that the buffer object is reading from. So if i
> rerecord that sound file under the same name the buffer will be
> updated with the sound file as it changes.

Why not recording with record~ directly into the buffer~ and then saving 
the buffer?...

But still, you can trigger in the moment you stop recording into 
sfrecord~ a read message to buffer~...

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com
