i'm sorry, but i can't achieve to do a counter in wich i can change the step.

i used the [counter] object. all is ok for "up" mode.

but all becomes complicated with "down" and "palindrome" modes.

so if you can share or give advice. thx in advance.

i'm sorry, but i can't achieve to do a counter in wich i can change the step.
i used the [counter] object. all is ok for "up" mode.
but all becomes complicated with "down" and "palindrome" modes.

i'm sure somebody made it before me.
so if you can share or give advice. thx in advance.

counter-with-variable-step

> i'm sorry, but i can't achieve to do a counter wich i can change the 

> i used the [counter] object. all is ok for "up" mode.

> but all becomes complicated with "down" and "palindrome" modes.

I'm not 100% sure I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but 

> i'm sorry, but i can't achieve to do a counter wich i can change the  
> step.
> i used the [counter] object. all is ok for "up" mode.
> but all becomes complicated with "down" and "palindrome" modes.

I'm not 100% sure I understand what you're trying to accomplish, but  
maybe this is closer? :

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com

> i'm confuse but now i can't find how to manage the minimum count...

Well, depending on what you want to do, there's the setmin message to 

counter, but note that that will be the minimum before doing the step 

Perhaps a "goal statement" is in order here: what are you trying to do 

Well, depending on what you want to do, there's the setmin message to  
counter, but note that that will be the minimum before doing the step  
multiplication.

Perhaps a "goal statement" is in order here: what are you trying to do  
exactly?

>here's what i can achieve from your solution.

It seems like your approach is trying to get counter to conform after it has counted. My approach is to get counter to count the right range to begin with.

On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:59 PM, elt wrote:
>here's what i can achieve from your solution.

counter with variable step