zion

Hello there - is there a code word to end - or determinate - as programmer a process a, after my process found what it should find - or did what it should do - so it does not have to go all the way into and back throe the priority tree branches of the process ? I know the 'Return' word from other languishes or the 'end' word.. but needs desperately the Max parallel.. Thanks a lot !!

Hello there -  is there a code word to end - or determinate - as programmer a process a, after my process found what it should find - or did what it should do - so it does not have to go all the way into and back throe  the priority tree branches of the process ? I know the 'Return' word from other languishes or the 'end' word.. but needs desperately the Max parallel..  Thanks a lot !!


how-to-determinate-a-procesa-pach-job-please-help

not really-- it's a different paradigm; what are you trying to do? do you have a patch? are you getting a stack overflow? if so you could use a gate object, otherwise can't really give you a specific answer...

Thanks for answering ! I do have a patch, but after my patch fines its goal and gives back the value to the calling patch, when the cpu is free it goes back to the un visited lefted branches and by that unnecessarily insist to finish and visit all the un visitet branches and occupies memory.. some times an overflow happens.. i use the gate but it still goes back recursively ....

I appreciate your efforts anyway in any case :-)

Thanks for answering !  I do have a patch, but after my patch fines its goal and gives back the value to the calling patch, when the cpu is free it goes back to the un visited lefted branches and by that unnecessarily insist to finish and visit all the un visitet branches and occupies memory.. some times an overflow happens.. i use the gate but it still goes back recursively ....
I appreciate your efforts anyway in any case :-)


Posting a patch would make it easier to fint the problem, but as you discribe it it sounds like a "design" error.

When your patch "finds its goal", as @Floating Point suggested you should have a gate, maybe a [gate 2] that send the value from its "other" outlet, thus stoping it from going back into the rest of the process.

Again with no patch, it a bit difficult to understand where the problem is.

Posting a patch would make it easier to fint the problem, but as you discribe it it sounds like a "design" error.
When your patch "finds its goal", as @Floating Point suggested you should have a gate, maybe a [gate 2] that send the value from its "other" outlet, thus stoping it from going back into the rest of the process.
Again with no patch, it a bit difficult to understand where the problem is. 

OK, I made a programming mistake, small one but tricky, I did use the gates you suggested and it works I would like to thank U both!!! 😌

OK, I made a programming  mistake,  small one but tricky, I did use the gates you suggested and it works I would like to thank U both!!! 😌


How to Determinate a proces(a pach job) - please help !