I was trying to reproduce the patch in the the jit.phys.multiple help file. I end up with a slightly different result. Would anybody know why this is? I guess it is to do with any of the attributes.
you have a typo in the jit.expr object in "multiple":
jit.expr @expr snorm[0}*4 snorm*4 snorm*4
that curly right bracket should be straight.
Log in to reply
Let us tell you about notable Max projects, obscure facts, and creative media artists of all kinds.