spierala

I would like to capture video on a separate computer and send it to the other one over ethernet.

i tried osc, the netsend object by olaf mathes and the bixcp.from/to externals...

with bixcp.from/to externals i was at least able to send a jit.matrix but only with very limited resolution (56x25)...

does anybody know how i can manage this? is it possible with osc to send jitter matrix data? 

does anybody know how i can manage this? is it possible with osc to send jitter matrix data? 
i?m using jitter 1.2.

jitter-matrix-over-ethernet

Jitter 1.5: jit.net.send/recv , jit.broadcast, and jit.qt.broadcast.

> Jitter 1.5: jit.net.send/recv , jit.broadcast, and jit.qt.broadcast.

is there no low cost solution for a poor student?

thanx
but
is it really the only solution?
is there no low cost solution for a poor student?

You can also use the QT Broadcast APP from apple if you do it ouside

You can also use the QT Broadcast APP from apple if you do it ouside
of max/jitter.

On 16-Apr-2006, at 15:55, flo spier wrote:

> with bixcp.from/to externals i was at least able to send a 

> jit.matrix but only with very limited resolution (56x25)...

56x25 was a hardware limitation of the Graz Medienfassade.

The bixcp.* objects have been overhauled and reincarnated as 

lbj.bixpack and lbj.bixunpack in the Litter Bundle for Jitter 

preview. Now the limiting factor is the amount of memory that Max can 

readily allocate, so you can handle matrices of just over 32,000 

pixels. There are strategies whereby I could extend this even 

further, but since Jitter 1.5 this is no longer a high priority.

The new objects are available for both Windows and Mac OS (OS X as 

well as OS 9-and-earlier). More information at the URI below.

> is there no low cost solution for a poor student?

LBJ is not free, but it costs a lot less than the Jitter update. It 

Peter Castine +--> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter

iCE: Sequencing, Recording & |home | chez nous|

Interface Building for |bei uns | i nostri|

On 16-Apr-2006, at 15:55, flo spier wrote:
> with bixcp.from/to externals i was at least able to send a  
> jit.matrix but only with very limited resolution (56x25)...

The bixcp.* objects have been overhauled and reincarnated as  
lbj.bixpack and lbj.bixunpack in the Litter Bundle for Jitter  
preview. Now the limiting factor is the amount of memory that Max can  
readily allocate, so you can handle matrices of just over 32,000  
pixels. There are strategies whereby I could extend this even  
further, but since Jitter 1.5 this is no longer a high priority.

The new objects are available for both Windows and Mac OS (OS X as  
well as OS 9-and-earlier). More information at the URI below.

LBJ is not free, but it costs a lot less than the Jitter update. It  
also includes a few other items.

--------------    http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/    -------------
Peter Castine             +--> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter

Not really sure what your trying to do, but only yesterday my housemate and

I were successfully using jit.net.send and jit.net.recv to send live webcam

data at pretty high frame rates via ethernet between a powerbook and a

Not really sure what your trying to do, but only yesterday my housemate and
I were successfully using jit.net.send and jit.net.recv to send live webcam
data at pretty high frame rates via ethernet between a powerbook and a
mac-mini.

Only yesterday you were using Jitter 1.5.x. Flo Spier is running 

Jitter 1.2 and does not have jit.net.send/receive. Maybe you missed 

Over and above the fact that the LBJ objects run on pre-1.5 Jitter:

- The lbj.bix* objects are more light-weight then the Jitter 1.5 

objects. In my experience they buy you a performance gain.

- The lbj.bix* objects offer the possibility of exchanging data with 

non-Jitter systems. The BIXCP data format is open and compatible with 

I *never* disputed the functionality of the jit.net.* objects. Not 

ever. But not everyone has Jitter 1.5 and there are other ways of 

Peter Castine +---> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter

Interface Building for |home | chez nous|

Max/MSP Extremely cool |bei uns | i nostri|

Only yesterday you were using Jitter 1.5.x. Flo Spier is running  
Jitter 1.2 and does not have jit.net.send/receive. Maybe you missed  
that.

- The lbj.bix* objects are more light-weight then the Jitter 1.5  
objects. In my experience they buy you a performance gain.

- The lbj.bix* objects offer the possibility of exchanging data with  
non-Jitter systems. The BIXCP data format is open and compatible with  
the popular CCC Blinkenlights format.

I *never* disputed the functionality of the jit.net.* objects. Not  
ever. But not everyone has Jitter 1.5 and there are other ways of  
transferring video over a network.

--------------    http://www.bek.no/~pcastine/Litter/    -------------
Peter Castine            +---> Litter Power & Litter Bundle for Jitter
                                Heavy-Duty Mathematics for Everyday Use
iCE:  Sequencing,  Recording &
       Interface  Building  for                   |home    | chez nous|
       Max/MSP   Extremely cool                   |bei uns |  i nostri|
       http://www.dspaudio.com/                   http://www.castine.de

Sorry Peter, I hadn't noticed that the current Jitter was out of the

question. Think I was just so impressed with the capabilities of the jit.net

objects I wanted to tell someone about them!

Sorry Peter, I hadn't noticed that the current Jitter was out of the
question. Think I was just so impressed with the capabilities of the jit.net
objects I wanted to tell someone about them!


hey thanx for your answers! so jitter 1.5 would be the solution... 

but i have to know if there are other ways of transferring video over network...

i have to ask my university for buying jitter 1.5 so I should be sure...

hey thanx for your answers! so jitter 1.5 would be the solution... 
but i have to know if there are other ways of transferring video over network...
i have to ask my university for buying jitter 1.5 so I should be sure...

jitter matrix over ethernet