Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for (int, 

f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music

> >>>>>> |sublime music for a desperate people|

Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for (int, 
int, A_GIMME) arguments ?

-- 
f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music
> >>>>>> http://www.personal-computer-music.com
> >>>>>> |sublime music for a desperate people|


more-specific-arguments-in-functions

> Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for 

It's all in A_GIMME, just verify the first two arguments to be int!

> Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for  
> (int, int, A_GIMME) arguments ?

It's all in A_GIMME, just verify the first two arguments to be int!
greetings, Thomas

I knew but i wanted to shortcut the typechecking in the function itself ;-)

if ((ac>=3) && (av[0]->a_type = A_LONG) && (av[1]->a_type = A_LONG))

>> Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for (int, 

> It's all in A_GIMME, just verify the first two arguments to be int!

f.e chanfrault | aka | personal computer music
> >>>>>> http://www.personal-computer-music.com
> >>>>>> |sublime music for a desperate people|

Thomas Grill wrote:
>
> Am 17.10.2006 um 11:11 schrieb f.e:
>
>> Is it possible (i guess yes) to specify a function to wait for (int, 
>> int, A_GIMME) arguments ?
>
> It's all in A_GIMME, just verify the first two arguments to be int!
> greetings, Thomas
>
> -- 
> Thomas Grill
> http://grrrr.org
>
>
>


> I knew but i wanted to shortcut the typechecking in the function itself ;-)

> if ((ac>=3) && (av[0]->a_type = A_LONG) && (av[1]->a_type = A_LONG))

> I knew but i wanted to shortcut the typechecking in the function itself ;-)
>
> BTW, my compiler deosn't like :
>
> if ((ac>=3) && (av[0]->a_type = A_LONG) && (av[1]->a_type = A_LONG))

Oh, same as Java indeed. But still not working... grrrrr

>> I knew but i wanted to shortcut the typechecking in the function 

>> if ((ac>=3) && (av[0]->a_type = A_LONG) && (av[1]->a_type = A_LONG))

Olaf Matthes wrote:
> f.e wrote:
>
>> I knew but i wanted to shortcut the typechecking in the function 
>> itself ;-)
>>
>> BTW, my compiler deosn't like :
>>
>> if ((ac>=3) && (av[0]->a_type = A_LONG) && (av[1]->a_type = A_LONG))
>
> you mean == and not =, I guess....
>
> Olaf
>


Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples using 

switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... The last 

Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples using 
switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... The last 
one works.

It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* -- 

t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the . 

operator. t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be 

> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples 

> using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch 

It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* --  
t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the .  
operator. t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be  
accesses with the -> operator.

> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples  
> using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch 
> (av.a_type)... The last one works.


> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples using

> switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... The last

The difference here depends on what av is.

On 10/17/06, f.e  wrote:
> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples using
> switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... The last
> one works.

> It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* --

> t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the .

> operator. t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be

> > Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples

> > using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch

On 10/17/06, Jeremy Bernstein  wrote:
> It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* --
> t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the .
> operator. t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be
> accesses with the -> operator.
>
> jb
>
> Am 17.10.2006 um 11:27 schrieb f.e:
>
> > Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples
> > using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch
> > (av.a_type)... The last one works.
>
>


I thought about something with this flavor... Thanks a lot, it's clearer 

> It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* -- 

> t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the . operator. 

> t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be accesses with 

>> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples 

>> using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... 

I thought about something with this flavor... Thanks a lot, it's clearer 
now.

Jeremy Bernstein wrote:
> It depends on whether you are working with a t_atom or a t_atom* -- 
> t_atom is a struct, whose members can be accessed with the . operator. 
> t_atom* is a pointer to a struct, whose members can be accesses with 
> the -> operator.
>
> jb
>
> Am 17.10.2006 um 11:27 schrieb f.e:
>
>> Strange. In an old IRCAM source, i've found typechecking examples 
>> using switch(av->a_type), then in the Fujinaga, switch(av.a_type)... 
>> The last one works.
>
>


more specific arguments in functions