I have been using a named jit.matrix to send different video streams around and "register" to switch between them... in any case, it just occurred to me that I can do that with send/receive as well. Is there a preferred way? Is one faster than the other? I am guessing that since one needs an extra metro to get the pic out of the second matrix the send/receive might be less CPU intensive... just wondering.

named-jit-matrix-vs-sendreceive-2

you don't need an extra metro, though you need to 'send' the metrobang

I think the send/receive option will be a more logical choice, but I don't know if there will be any difference in performance

There are some test suites out there, not sure where, that could run lots of iterations of each patch and give some hard figures if needed. Maybe one of those would help . . .

There are some test suites out there, not sure where,  that could run lots of iterations of each patch and give some hard figures if needed. Maybe one of those would help . . .


true enough. don't really need the second metro...

still wondering what the convention is. And yes, running a benchmark might be a good idea. I do have those patches somewhere.

true enough. don't really need the second metro...
still wondering what the convention is. And yes, running a benchmark might be a good idea. I do have those patches somewhere.


named jit.matrix vs. send/receive