Adam Kendall

SITUATION: I want to use pattr as a messaging/control system to control the same object in multiple voices of a poly~.

In the parent patch, I connect a UI object to a pattr. Then I bind the pattr to the same type of UI in a poly~

DESIRED RESULT: I want the parent UI object to control the poly~'s UI object in all voices of the poly~

ACTUAL RESULT: I can only get the parent UI object to control the poly~ UI object in voice 1.

Please see the two patches in this email for an example.

SITUATION:  I want to use pattr as a messaging/control system to control the same object in multiple voices of a poly~.  

In the parent patch, I connect a UI object to a pattr.  Then I bind the pattr to the same type of UI in a poly~

DESIRED RESULT:  I want the parent UI object to control the poly~'s UI object in all voices of the poly~

ACTUAL RESULT:  I can only get the parent UI object to control the poly~ UI object in  voice 1.

pattr-and-poly-how-bindto-to-all-voices

There is currently no "voice 0" available for technical reasons.

Am 17.03.2007 um 03:35 schrieb Adam Kendall:

poly_the_poly::nbox_poly.1 = voice 1
poly_the_poly::nbox_poly.2 = voice 2
...

Ok, thanks. 0 would be good, but this is workable.

I figured my problem had to do with an "array"-oriented labeling, like you indicated. I tried (2) and [2]. Since Max typically uses either () or [] to address multiples of something (like the poly~ windows use (), and I think objects use []), why is the convention here a dot?

Ok, thanks.  0 would be good, but this is workable.

I figured my problem had to do with an "array"-oriented labeling, like you indicated.  I tried (2) and [2].  Since Max typically uses either () or [] to address multiples of something (like the poly~ windows use (), and I think objects use []), why is the convention here a dot?

Just one of the beautiful inconsistencies of your favorite visual 

Am 17.03.2007 um 14:24 schrieb Adam Kendall:

Just one of the beautiful inconsistencies of your favorite visual  
programming environment!

> SITUATION: I want to use pattr as a messaging/control system to

> control the same object in multiple voices of a poly~.

> In the parent patch, I connect a UI object to a pattr. Then I bind

> the pattr to the same type of UI in a poly~

> DESIRED RESULT: I want the parent UI object to control the poly~'s

Better use a send/receive pair instead of pattr, or an inlet with target 

Adam Kendall schrieb:
> SITUATION:  I want to use pattr as a messaging/control system to
> control the same object in multiple voices of a poly~.
>
> In the parent patch, I connect a UI object to a pattr.  Then I bind
> the pattr to the same type of UI in a poly~
>
> DESIRED RESULT:  I want the parent UI object to control the poly~'s
> UI object in all voices of the poly~

Better use a send/receive pair instead of pattr, or an inlet with target 
0 ....

-- 
Stefan Tiedje------------x-------
--_____-----------|--------------
--(_|_ ----|-----|-----()-------
-- _|_)----|-----()--------------
----------()--------www.ccmix.com


pattr and poly~ - How bindto to all voices?