jamie jewett

I am not having a problem with processing speeds at all at this point

but it's a good idea for saving some speed...

Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:27:04 PM

Subject: [jitter] Re: Re: Re: Re: camera recommendation motion tracking - active IR markers

You can also use a line object after you get your tracking values, then

turn the sample rate down. This will free up a lot of resources, and

for most gesture or motion tracking it's fine, and often makes the

result smoother anyways. Plus you can tweak the line values, so if they're

at 0 ms, it's as though it's not there, for a smoothness comparison. You

won't need nearly as high an FPS in this case. Of course, you'll be

introducing interpolated / non-actual values, but these are often just

fine for a lot of applications, and take a heck of a lot less processing

----- Original Message ----
From: Seejay James 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:27:04 PM
Subject: [jitter] Re: Re: Re: Re: camera recommendation motion tracking - active IR markers

You can also use a line object after you get your tracking values, then
 turn the sample rate down. This will free up a lot of resources, and
 for most gesture or motion tracking it's fine, and often makes the
 result smoother anyways. Plus you can tweak the line values, so if they're
 at 0 ms, it's as though it's not there, for a smoothness comparison. You
 won't need nearly as high an FPS in this case. Of course, you'll be
 introducing interpolated / non-actual values, but these are often just
 fine for a lot of applications, and take a heck of a lot less processing
 to generate.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: camera recommendation motion tracking - active IR markers