peripatitis

Is there a "scientific" formula about the inverse relation between these two ?

I would like to be able to change the Q (e.x from 0.5 to 100) without having the drop in amplitude.

I have obviously scaled the gain in relation to Q, but perhaps there is a better way?

Is there a "scientific" formula about the inverse relation between these two ?
I would like to be able to change the Q (e.x from 0.5 to 100) without having the drop in amplitude.
I have obviously scaled the gain in relation to Q, but perhaps there is a better way?


reson-q-and-amplitude

Resurrecting this post, as I was just browsing around to find the answer too... Still no one? I'll browse other resources.

I did have some solution for this (trial and error solution rather than scientific), I can't find the old abstraction I made so... I would love for someone to contribute some pearls of wisdom about this supposedly common issue.

https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/filters/Resonator_Bandwidth_Terms_Pole.html

and make it max-friendly, will keep you posted, unless someone else chimes in

I did have some solution for this (trial and error solution rather than scientific), I can't find the old abstraction I made so... I would love for someone to contribute some pearls of wisdom about this supposedly common issue.
I am trying to decipher this formula 

https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/filters/Resonator_Bandwidth_Terms_Pole.html 

and make it max-friendly, will keep you posted, unless someone else chimes in 

See section B.6 in the JOS. As I understand it, it's difficult to tune two pole resonators with high Q because the poles interfere with each other, and so it's much easier to use a complex one-pole resonator because the tuning is simpler and the gain is constant across frequencies.

I don't know if this is what CNMAT's resonators~ (available in the Package Manager) uses, but suspect that it might since it's easy to specify tuning and sustain.

This page offers a good explanation of how they work: 

http://www.katjaas.nl/complexintegrator/complexresonator.html

You could roll your own in gen~, but I'd recommend trying resonators~ first to see if it will do what you need.

See section B.6 in the JOS.  As I understand it, it's difficult to tune two pole resonators with high Q because the poles interfere with each other, and so it's much easier to use a complex one-pole resonator because the tuning is simpler and the gain is constant across frequencies.

I don't know if this is what CNMAT's resonators~ (available in the Package Manager) uses, but suspect that it might since it's easy to specify tuning and sustain.  

This page offers a good  explanation of how they work: 
http://www.katjaas.nl/complexintegrator/complexresonator.html

reson~ Q and Amplitude