Carlo

since I need to apply spectral transformations to quite complex sound 

material converted into sdif format before resinthesizing it in wav, I need 

that Threefates~ also is able to handle 1024 partials. Threefates will drive 

Could you make an upgrade of Threefates also?

Hi Michael,
since I need to apply spectral transformations to quite complex sound 
material converted into sdif format before resinthesizing it in wav, I need 
that Threefates~ also is able to handle 1024 partials. Threefates will drive 
sinusoids (with 1024 oscs).
Could you make an upgrade of Threefates also?
Thank you very much,

P.S.
What about "SDIF-stft~" e "SDIF-istft~"?
Do you know something about them?

sdif-files_-3-for-mzed

Quote: carlo-laurenzi wrote on Mon, 17 September 2007 14:19

----------------------------------------------------

> since I need to apply spectral transformations to quite complex sound 

> material converted into sdif format before resinthesizing it in wav, I need 

> that Threefates~ also is able to handle 1024 partials. Threefates will drive 

Give threefates an argument, like [threefates 1024]

Quote: carlo-laurenzi wrote on Mon, 17 September 2007 14:19
----------------------------------------------------
> Hi Michael,
> since I need to apply spectral transformations to quite complex sound 
> material converted into sdif format before resinthesizing it in wav, I need 
> that Threefates~ also is able to handle 1024 partials. Threefates will drive 
> sinusoids (with 1024 oscs).

Does Threefates has a limit in handling tuples amounts? 1024, 2048?...

Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 11:50 PM

Subject: [maxmsp] Re: Sdif files_ 3 - for Mzed

> Give threefates an argument, like [threefates 1024]

> || michael f. zbyszynski -- molecular gastronimist

Does Threefates has a limit in handling tuples amounts? 1024, 2048?...
Thank you 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "mzed" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 11:50 PM
Subject: [maxmsp] Re: Sdif files_ 3 - for Mzed

> Give threefates an argument, like [threefates 1024]
>
> mz
>
> --
> || michael f. zbyszynski -- molecular gastronimist
> || http://www.cnmat.berkeley.edu/
> || http://www.mikezed.com/


Quote: carlo-laurenzi wrote on Tue, 18 September 2007 11:22

> Does Threefates has a limit in handling tuples amounts? 1024, 2048?...

Eventually it will run out of memory, but it can do at least 100000.

Quote: carlo-laurenzi wrote on Tue, 18 September 2007 11:22
----------------------------------------------------
> Does Threefates has a limit in handling tuples amounts? 1024, 2048?...

whatever happend to [spearsynth~] anyway.

i mean, all those recent questions about how to get spear sdif into max ...

Quote: Roman Thilenius wrote on Wed, 19 September 2007 17:21

> whatever happend to [spearsynth~] anyway.

> i mean, all those recent questions about how to get spear sdif into max ... 

SDIF-buffer, SDIF-tuples, these both work fine.

Quote: Roman Thilenius wrote on Wed, 19 September 2007 17:21
----------------------------------------------------
>
> whatever happend to [spearsynth~] anyway.
>
> i mean, all those recent questions about how to get spear sdif into max ... 
----------------------------------------------------

Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB, and 

Cycling '74 has other development priorities at this moment,

I would suggest that you investigate the use of mxj and Java networking 

tools to realize your goals in the near term.

If you are unfamiliar with Java and how it is used in Max, have a look 

at the included documentation, example objects, and give a look at the 

Perhaps someone more well-versed in SC/OSC than myself could suggest a 

Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB, and 
Cycling '74 has other development priorities at this moment,
I would suggest that you investigate the use of mxj and Java networking 
tools to realize your goals in the near term.

If you are unfamiliar with Java and how it is used in Max, have a look 
at the included documentation, example objects, and give a look at the 
Java-Dev forum.

Perhaps someone more well-versed in SC/OSC than myself could suggest a 
SC-based workaround as well.

Quote: andrewb@cycling74.com wrote on Thu, 20 September 2007 12:00

> Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB,

The "ot" in "otudp" stands for open transport. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Transport

Essentially, this is pre-OSX Apple technology.

Quote: andrewb@cycling74.com wrote on Thu, 20 September 2007 12:00
----------------------------------------------------
> Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB, 

thank you very much! I'll try with your path. I am really unfamiliar with 

Java, I remember last year your lecture ( with Emmanul together) about 

JavaScript. I will recall that expierence.

Subject: Re: [maxmsp] Re: otudp or udpreceive

> Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB, and Cycling 

> '74 has other development priorities at this moment,

> I would suggest that you investigate the use of mxj and Java networking 

> tools to realize your goals in the near term.

> If you are unfamiliar with Java and how it is used in Max, have a look at 

> the included documentation, example objects, and give a look at the 

> Perhaps someone more well-versed in SC/OSC than myself could suggest a 

Hello, Andrew,
thank you very much! I'll try with your path. I am really unfamiliar with 
Java, I remember last year your lecture ( with Emmanul together) about 
JavaScript. I will recall that expierence.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "andrew benson" 
To: 
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: [maxmsp] Re: otudp or udpreceive

> Given the fact that CNMAT is unlikely to revive otudp for UB, and Cycling 
> '74 has other development priorities at this moment,
> I would suggest that you investigate the use of mxj and Java networking 
> tools to realize your goals in the near term.
>
> If you are unfamiliar with Java and how it is used in Max, have a look at 
> the included documentation, example objects, and give a look at the 
> Java-Dev forum.
>
> Perhaps someone more well-versed in SC/OSC than myself could suggest a 
> SC-based workaround as well.
>
> Best,
> Andrew B.
>
