two faders controlling eachother
Is there any way of having multiple faders controlling eachother? If I want to have one fader in a subpatcher controlling f.ex. volume in a patch, and another fader another place (for visual representation) controlling the same parameter. Then It would be nice that each faders were controlling eachother, so I won’t close the first patcher, then forgetting i have set the volume, and thereafter trying to control it somewhere else.
----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 568.3ocsT1ziSCCDF9b5uhQ4BfTIJePUobAwwdFtgpPtISZL3XGYOoevpke6 XOIY2sPWoJ1xg1H+Ne32GON4tYQwaMGQWL7A3qPTzcyhhXofPz35n3VwwRkv woEWZZaQMEOeHFgGIVesCnFzhfPeBNHNAlZnQrWp2As8JR1oPnVTgVGTZzj0 nTgXnnrwDJ7iv5ZXsuRMAjITJBF8XMfTCBv0usSPk9jOqE0I3wDXuQ02hCIx YM26jJ+Ot6isYZUmRThvqqMVXuz0KTfE6rnyClfjF8aNaC7k.Ngu4cBq+Ag1 D3KMnFVSvASupB1hfV56H0HHFoITODNQtHuyAmIvqQ+JBJUFGx6Ssz5HXDy4 AIM3s4NjnP4xgCFGRb1CPOPJe5Kp8tCH6I12losFjje6ZwC7DBUNLAllfdag kldMOFe+nnrhGplse+sKmRr12KsmeNxmrRg5oQbxexQxxSRGkYJ7F4aVrjFt iksZgOLTjlxOxxBOxxVljBaFqR22J0Jj3qaYOJZ5oI0zf38ylE9a9K7d6mIQ 4O.ydzVqLGh+a9WbK4OeICdVJeLrhwOO8+O86DR8ut.bESZC8mN0gCFM1I2o CDBwxvUiMOOSEECLUrXhF+h28rPkO4Bs+pZWPYU5CGYmSZ9Mjzra.oSSu+YR yxWbEnxcieu7O9xLaof9476L81xIZFYExdvSUny+sC96ZOIG+jGdz2MxpJjC OYuVYUmw67QK.at3r3ZcTwU3nrWfi7Kte1uAutbxUA -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
Don’t know why, but this works.
----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 1067.3oc6ZksbaBCE8Y7WACOm5AgYK8CoujoiGAn3nVrfAjcbal1u8hVvFgA LNlXGOUufMZ4x4dz8pkyn2lYXEksCUZY9UymLMLdalgAuHVAFx2MrVC2EmBK 4MyhfdMK5GVOHphh1Q4EmatqtrmyHTBbMhW92PEIPBrtNxl0XRJhxsEPVHNg 2zJy9k.PiVlsg1toLaWh+M21.vbaYwhVR+UNR3JVVleWVUNjF+BlrZYAJlJp 0w1spmlg7mNg7m1ysU6BpPRBRVn5aiSQaQEk3LRCHYX0vvOxrku3oqM6G2vF VthaWklE+SD2gsqKLA874XirbD4P64sP4gZKwj7BTIhPgTIva9cgaRoK6lTU q+YXLp2N2ynsg0pBbRFgACk9xJt9C9jIvgAb1yCHm2BBLuiNSyxRifEawk3n TjxHQUjKjfWCoHJVfHG688CuNu.SnJ1BQfU13kx3hrzTESIpYaG0jf1hiQuh Snuvs0A9RIWpQjiRNkR4CkaoleUQ2nhzrWaV4PTeeIasS37WzpGGmzMPh2IR 95KAzMTLhyiX8Zj.V2q+LaV8edX54xByc61sLBRV8tYS6tYS2fa.aFHxeB4r YvhqMaVd4rYOwlt98yl1iiM6O3ykO6ef60lt1BS2fXT1TyVKbuAwd97fNGfO e4pqdrG0LxDO4DInehz4cRjhzCSK9BPiZ1wG4T5Bm4de.TJmCN2I278GW.1Q N+3cZY3jW8SkdEmsdMRr.tk0DRFB7d1KbFLtIm5Oowy4Bb1CaUJES5aWG7uM q9tYgxrMEw0CR0Q9l.EbjfJoXx98N9zg4ZLUA7K3jD0cpwIZbRdV03uDfiLH 9bwMaY2Vv4t.2b9dL3lsKsOQ3tC3zMtYqf+YB29iMNA74JNwcrwIASHtkEV4 .hiEWB2hRVV8YplHaIjRKvQanhodTNl7PGH7xORYm8ruSvVcZ6HXp7776Mo0 oN.7rCLA+oXLbLpirBhI+sVBiJ9EUjyMJeV9Nj.woCIPb5VBDm9z5nDuh.Sa u6hAD9.Xu+HWrMBueyEmou9wpDj+iCqDTSUMZ3h.uEGz1oshHSi7Q.Oes7QZ 4izxGokORKejV9Hs7QZ4izxGokORKezs4Xp++JKv8pLL2qxdcWKy3UWVWs7Q 2F4irGV9ng0MQJMzQBmbAhNIkK49Pzovqv0ORxDZ8iz5Go0ORqejV+Hs9QZ8 iz5Go0ORqej95Gou9QZcXzW+H80ORqezMR+HvG1sORp6wIDBhaA0UUDdd6nV o+eTzJ69ScXUjdhTCTxvNNJscDpbKlNdABr6LOv6nWCDsArXt7kdT3ZzdhJH 6wSbNOO4BwD6ZYcZLYeUwD+ycpQ7V.+jXB3G1XDG341bDu9UwHNv2ahFwAiw QBOSGwwtoiX6q3HxWkNBHXhbjVfraOAbAQIUu7mY+CX5b6LB -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 660.3oc4W1riaBCDG+L7Tf74zJrcLX5o1Gf9DTsJhD7twUIlHvYaZWs8Yu1i MzP1ksP9RosGBnYvd7L+l+3XdJL.MubmnFE8gnuDED7TXP.3x5HvaGfVmuaw p7ZXXnGxkpehl3dR4V8JgV+8MBWHP0xGT4qPShPRkFEcmebapD0BkNWKKUyp DKztgSSiee7jHBkauE6uzNK010RkI9vBS7NMwUTsw5ASXlY3Wfb8hkR0C8Fb BXfmdP7cEP2En.pyx4e8c3Xj02ygg1KSFHgThuYlbChdLuRkuF3C59sqabqE 6f7zl45pHySh93bopPWFoWl+YgoHaF58kJcaH9Tkzx2dvuE7vu1ZzN4Z4ODN f0xqNnE+FPLIyQO3Flk1vxdfH8UfHtIcMh.cYkOW4osgnN+QQwLyXMK6LKNj y2pcpxfVFaSuJCELfYlPkOeEDmX3YPCZrsoypPlRbfI8RHj6D7iRHyOy53x9 jwk2lpXJFfVJ2wtiPEm8uuHljwbThcADwcC9QIhSNyhXonOUrTbSJiIYScXK wcKa7x3z+C1KF61tjFeIjwLeK.ezxX1YVFK5UFKtQkwLJfMWeB6rFmLl9WfL d+lzg3enR7SSrh8hUR1weB38EqvzPqjpC+hAXss96xl5xsUKZpvliBF86Uuv z7jJ3828GTbmAsTVTHfm2ToqkEaJMPvmDQ28pcpAmS1kC+mxI73xIJGz1TNz .nIzWZQhcNMmIg4sNwJIa.vkeUYKe.nMajjcpChtcMnvK.GXgScv2nzYdqSr NXCnNniqNHIvehS3tyh5ORZGKbraHIDnNrVmXcPGfBgcUUHoCHiRtpYTx.50 oiTy59xMJwcnAN+kVv1xFmlsAXsaR2Yq2vmC+EvyvdQl -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
is another option
how many of us tried to answer this quickly, and got the old ‘stack overflow’ message!? Errrm, me.
----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 437.3oc2UF0SBCCDG+4sOEM844xtxFL7ChuXHlBqB0v5HrR.kfe1s8VGNQHT DiwvKM6t1K2+e89mtsgAzwUaD0Tx8jGIAAaCCBvT1DAt3.ZIeyj47Z7XTkXc 03WnQMaoEazX550D8LQoPKV1tmZUoTMWnw5.WxmqTZEuTfE8fXYAWw6TP0J8 gUzjR+5BQiLoTxH2VK35IyjpoOsTLQ2rKCXwIQjg8sq4I1UlYceIxBryFDta .P6HpZ4aXC.HNwlcWXncIxyqkobo58iRN6nz0lUpL2XKvFyxLp8DLWKmp3yo QDaA9bA.r8raBRO0U.i9CX8etE.X49ZA5O7VzB3t.7zBjbCZAR6gNfLOb.42 hNfF9AXnGF.n67GO.ctTc3OEvlXy+U7qqVsbRq9bunX5099THp0REWKqTcOj 4kWxmhYlrnPf62hdorXQkARmHXrTDj9M7.IwCx9VXNZ5YLH1EPFczQn2j7UQ dBRXWFIWolruWcdMk7mpIrcmahefvOqlP259QLv52ch2F1LwgdC9kl3fOfje Yfjk0vAJ0TvgQ2n7A1fLVr66q0hj6gEAtBGhIXW3GnpIRIC -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
Jeremy, your version seems to be the "easyst" – but wouldn’t the use of "pattr" mean that what ever setting the fader is set to, when the patch is closed, is the setting it would be set to, whenever the patch is opened up again? (havn’t looked into the pattr yet… just think i have a vague idea of what it does).
You can turn that off – @autorestore 0
Cool thanks a lot man!
can anyone give me any of these patches in max 4.6 format as Im having the same problem.
cheers but still just as baffled none of the faders seem to be connected to each other. is the information being sent remotely.
had a go at making it but dont recognise the two coloured boxes with the number 1 in them??????
They are the inlet and outlet objects.
You actually have done something wrong. Included you find an image of what it should look like. In the original post the value, send and receive objects are inside a patcher. Personally I don't think that this is the best way of making a stereo fader, or that the gain object is a useful object in terms of good gain control. Included an image with an expression based on a db scale, that has feel similar to the fader of a mixing desk. If you use that value to multiply two (or more) signals, one fader allows you then to control multiple levels at once.
ive got it now it works thanks so much johan. i couldnt get the second one to work though, i found a tutorial in max showing how to have a numerical decibel gauge the only problem with it was that as im using drum hit samples the sound was over before you had chance to read the level is their any way to get the highest peak level to stick in the gauge for around a second or two.
I want to use the gain control that give the decibel reading however i really want to use the gain slider rather than the normal slider just for ascetic reasons. as the highest value of a normal slider is 127 and a gain slider is 157, is their any way i can make the highest value of a gain slider to be 127, i tried connecting an object box stating – 0.236 but obviously this just subtracted 0.236 off of the last hit value. any ideas anyone.
check out the (scale) object :) pretty easy with that one, or change the sliders max value in the sliders inspector (mark the slider, that press cmd+i)
hi johan thanks for the slider that works more like a mixing desk fader, but I now have max 5 and i have tried to recreate it. however i cant seem to create the expr pow. could you please post it me as a max 5 patch. thanks lee
No worries johan I have done it i had a typo in it. thankyou
I want to use more of these faders that communicate with each other. but want one fader to communicate with a specific fader and another to communicate with a different specific fader. how is this possible. fader A talks to fader B then fader C talks to fader D.
Hi I found the answer to my above query. but i have noticed that this patch makes my patch work either realy slow or crash max.
Forums > MaxMSP