I’m not sure I understand your question.

Shouldn’t it be someething like:

JitterObject arr[] = new JitterObject[100];

for ( int index = 0; index < arr.length; index++ )
{
arr[index] = new JitterObject( "jit.op" );
}

// Then you decide what you are going to do with 100 jit.ops.

You can have either:

JitterObject[] arr = new JitterObject[100];

or:

JitterObject arr[] = new JitterObject[100];

I don’t like that syntactic variability, but it does save you a few characters of typing if you want to declare a whole lot of arrays.

I haven’t used the jit.gl objects yet. I did see your previous post but I don’t think I have sufficiently reliable advice to offer in response to that question. Sorry.

I do hope to play around with the jit.gl objects driven by Java. In Adobe Flash I very much like using actionscript to easily produce detailed highly abstract animations. It will be possible to do similar things with jit.gl objects, but in 3D. However it’s one of those things I haven’t gotten around to yet.