[ann] Bonk3~

I use Bonk v1.3 a lot so thank you for this latest version...

Matt

Thanks for this update ! Bonk~ has always been of of my favorite max objects !

the "debouncedecay" (Minimum time (msec) between attacks) parameter doesn't seems to work better than in previous version ... : any value > 0 just makes bonk3~ ouput nothing. or maybe I misenderstand how to use this parameter ?..

(macbookpro 2.3ghz / os10.5.3 / maxMSP 5.02)

Mathieu Chamagne

________________ Mathieu Chamagne mathieu.chamagne@free.fr

http://mathieuchamagne.com http://www.maxobjects.com

about debouncedecay : if debouncedecay is set to 1 : bonk3~ only ouput a new bang if new attack loudness is > previous attack loudness. so very quickly, you reach the maximum and bonk~ stop ouputing new value (or you'll probably end by breaking your percussion / mic trying to play louder and louder to trig bonk~ !). I don't think that this behaviour match the description of this parameter : "Minimum time (msec) between attacks"

Mathieu

________________ Mathieu Chamagne mathieu.chamagne@free.fr

http://mathieuchamagne.com http://www.maxobjects.com

Thank's for bonk~ update,

I'm trying to compile the object for windows, but i got an error message : missing plus~.c file (and plus~.def) in the folder .

Could you add these files ? thank's

nicolas carriere

barry threw schrieb: > Miller Puckette and I are happy to release Bonk3~, and updated version > of Bonk~. It's pretty configurable, and I find better results with this > than the previous version. Don't ask me what happened to Bonk2~, we're > still figuring out how to deal with it emotionally.

Thanks for doing this...

And as you are into this bonk~/fiddle~ business, may I ask the question?

As far as I know, both bonk and fiddle~ do a fft on the signal. Would it be hard to create a version which would run inside a pfft~? Often I need that kind of analysis and have to do an fft on the same signal. To avoid to do the fft twice, I could imagine to deliver the fft'ed signal inside a pfft~...

Stefan

-- Stefan Tiedje------------x------- --_____-----------|-------------- --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()------- -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- ----------()--------www.ccmix.com

They aren't needed...the visual C file just isn't correct....that is just the template that ships with the max sdk...

you'll have to set up the vc++ to find the requisite files yourself...i don't have access to a windows machine and vc without a good deal of work, that i'm not going to do because i don't personally care that much right now.

if you give me like 4 months i'll probably have to eventually, but it isn't at the top of my docket.

bt

On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:51 AM, nicolas carriere wrote:

> Thank's for bonk~ update, > > I'm trying to compile the object for windows, but i got an error > message : > missing plus~.c file (and plus~.def) in the folder . > > Could you add these files ? > thank's > > nicolas carriere

Yeah, that seems a bit off. Will research.

bt

On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:44 AM, mathieu.chamagne@gmail.com wrote:

> about debouncedecay : > if debouncedecay is set to 1 : > bonk3~ only ouput a new bang if new attack loudness is > previous > attack loudness. so very quickly, you reach the maximum and bonk~ > stop ouputing new value (or you'll probably end by breaking your > percussion / mic trying to play louder and louder to trig bonk~ !). > I don't think that this behaviour match the description of this > parameter : "Minimum time (msec) between attacks" > > Mathieu > > ________________ > Mathieu Chamagne > mathieu.chamagne@free.fr > > http://mathieuchamagne.com > http://www.maxobjects.com > > > >

Thats a good idea, but I doubt I get to it for awhile.

Someone else is welcome to tackle that from the source. I would give it about 4 months before I can think about it really.

bt

On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote:

> barry threw schrieb: >> Miller Puckette and I are happy to release Bonk3~, and updated >> version of Bonk~. It's pretty configurable, and I find better >> results with this than the previous version. Don't ask me what >> happened to Bonk2~, we're still figuring out how to deal with it >> emotionally. > > Thanks for doing this... > > And as you are into this bonk~/fiddle~ business, may I ask the > question? > > As far as I know, both bonk and fiddle~ do a fft on the signal. > Would it be hard to create a version which would run inside a pfft~? > Often I need that kind of analysis and have to do an fft on the same > signal. To avoid to do the fft twice, I could imagine to deliver the > fft'ed signal inside a pfft~... > > Stefan > > > -- > Stefan Tiedje------------x------- > --_____-----------|-------------- > --(_|_ ----|-----|-----()------- > -- _|_)----|-----()-------------- > ----------()--------www.ccmix.com >

I looked where bonk3~'s supposed to be and it's not there anymore:

Fortunately, I found it in my archive but it's OS X UB, of course -- has anyone compiled it for Windows?

Thanks.

I would also find a version of bonk which works in windows and max5 really useful

i found bonk3 via google cache and built a windows version if anyone wants it

can I get the OS X UB version off of anyone? bonk~ is a major component of my patch.

I think that bonk3~ just became bonk1.4 upon release. (1.4 is still mistakenly labeled 1.3 when you load it in the max window, but is 1.4 on the site). I could be wrong about all this.

And can be found here:

I am on OS X 10.5.x and have been using bonk1.4 no problems.