Buffers inside poly patcher

    Feb 05 2013 | 7:06 pm
    Hi guys,
    i know there are tons of topics about this out there; even i red all of them, Max still makes me crazy. Straight to the problem:
    Turning on the DSP, the Max window tells me that record~ and groove~ don't recognize any buffer~; where do i wrong?!
    Thanks in advance, cheers!

    • Feb 05 2013 | 10:45 pm
      I can't really explain why your approach doesn't work, but this way should (haven't tested it):
    • Feb 06 2013 | 12:22 am
      Hi Terry, you have not to test it, it works! :)
      Your approach seems the ones i've seen here around in the past using [sprintf], by the way it's sad that the simple way suggested by Max tutorial itself can't work...
      Thanks again!
    • Feb 06 2013 | 1:01 am
      A problem seems to remain: obviously every time an instance works, it passes from busy to mute by its relative thispoly~ object. Due to this, every time thispoly~ throws out messages, it initializes its buffer, groove and record with different names. The result seems to be that only the first instance do the job.
      Just to be clear: the goal of my patch is to have a x-number of simultaneous buffer/record/groove that record/playback the same audio source at different times; their playback material must overrides themselves, here is the why i want to use a poly~ patch.
      Doing this without using a poly~ approach is not that difficult: i could design a given number of copies of buffer/record and playback them in one single patch; but i'd want to learn to do this through a poly~ approach!! :)
    • Feb 06 2013 | 9:23 am
      Yup, this one seems to allow interaction between thispoly~ and buffer/record/groove only once, at the loading, and never more...isn't it?
    • Feb 06 2013 | 11:03 am
      ok sorry for leading you up the garden path-- i now remember there is an idiosyncratic thing about variable arguments in poly~, you need to have #0 immediately followed by a symbol, such as #0foo, otherwise it won't 'bind' to the argument name.
      so try it like this:
      another thing is that even if you have two copies of thispoly and bang one, the other one will also output-- very annoying!
      apologies again--
    • Feb 06 2013 | 11:26 am
      Hi Terry, no problem! Anyway, thanks to this entire topic, i'm more efficient using poly~ patches! :)