Can this patch be used with wave~?


    Feb 16 2008 | 9:27 pm

    • Feb 16 2008 | 11:38 pm
      playback position times file length goes out, divide loop size by file length comes in. that's about it.
      regards,
      kjg
    • Feb 17 2008 | 2:12 am
      Thanks for the help kjg.
      I'm currently trying to implement it in my patch but it doesn't seem to work with the setup I want to have.
      Can anyone tell me where I've gone wrong and how I can keep this setup but still include the new sah~ elements?
      max v2;
      Thanks again,
      Rhys
    • Feb 17 2008 | 4:13 am
      I'd be happy to look at it but it would help if you define your goal _and_ the problem you're having with your current patch.
      Regards,
      kjg
    • Feb 17 2008 | 10:35 am
      Thanks dude.
      I'm trying to use volker's method of sampling and holding with the trapezoid envelope to create "clickless" loops. In this case using that method with this current setup only results in a weird output.
      I'm after the same output as the previous patches using a the phasor~ => wave~ => index~ method.
      Using this method I can then write weird and wonderful waveforms to the buffer~ Phasor1 using peek~ and use the sah~ method to have loops complete with a no click envelope but with a twist.
      Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the matter,
      Rhys