Feb 21 2006 | 5:59 pm
    [tapin~]->[tapout~] i would like to change delay times without the transposition - sig or the clicks - float
    i am thinking crossfade between 2 tapouts but thought i would check to see if someone has already solved this problem before delving in
    happy tunes don
    it takes all of us

    • Feb 21 2006 | 6:18 pm
      Yes, there's an example featuring a smoothed delay in the MSP nightschool at Berkeley. At the crux are basically pipes, and !- 1.
      I've also reimplemented it; e-mail me offlist if you want a copy.
      Peter McCulloch
    • Feb 21 2006 | 6:30 pm
      Sorry for making the propaganda :-) Have a look to ej.vdb~ :
      Best, ej
    • Feb 21 2006 | 8:44 pm
      Yes, crossfade between two is good - and remember that you can do that with one tapout~ with two outputs - switch the time on the output that is now zeroed - I think this will be much more efficient.
      There is another way, which was shown to me by Miller Puckette in, I recall, 1993, and I have used it many times since. Delay the change by 10mS; at the same time ramp the output level down to zero over 10mS; then ramp the output up again over 10mS. The delay change will occur at the zero point of the output, so no click; and the very short interruption will be masked by the new sound that occurs after the shift.
      Lawrence Casserley - Lawrence Electronic Operations - Colourscape Music Festivals -
    • Feb 24 2006 | 7:18 am
      the file you sent me works great - peter
      probably what miller showed you lawrence
      happy tunes don
      it takes all of us
    • May 09 2006 | 6:33 pm
      Hi, I need to get transposing for the feedbacks of a delay (just like good old hardware). Is it possible without using buffers?. Any help or directions towards objects or patchers (not tutorials!!!) will be appreciated. AI
    • May 09 2006 | 7:07 pm
      Look at the "Pitchshifting playground" patch in the examples folders.
      Peter McCulloch
    • May 10 2006 | 2:19 am