display time in min:sec:ms
I have this patch:
why I have zero following the ms ?
{Edit: it is fine....}
is it possible to have the ms show in 1ms intervals?
This what I'm getting now:
ok now it seems right apart of index 0:
This is a little better but still not quite right:
nothing is right there.
joins are out of function.
you use ms but only 2 digits ....
what do you want to write into coll
what is index, what is that 0 1 before time doing there ?
what do you want to write into coll
what is index, what is that 0 1 before time doing there ?
I'm writing data from two sensors sends over UDP. this 0 1 are just for the example...
sorry, but you don't understand basics of objects you use.
if you run clocker and want 1ms time display like 00:04:938
and capture into coll using 1 ms interval no matter if sensor input changes or not,
you are going to produce 1000 lines of text per 1 second,
which is a bad thing to do in my opinion. in every aspect,
(including why to write 00:01:808 into coll, when one knows that it translates to so many ms
when index get out of coll)
but if you want it so, then what for do you need 2 clockers, that gates, joins etc ?
you are going to produce 1000 lines of text per 1 second,
which is a bad thing to do in my opinion. in every aspect,
bad for the software to handle? or just too much details in file?
why should someone read that many lines if no sensor data came in ?
that is nonesense
I agree with you, but I my friend that looks on that data use it inside excel or something to transform it into graph.. he won't mind too much on the numbers of line...
not my business...
but that friend of yours is stupid if he can't create graph
without every ms listed there.
I will delete now that long coll list ....
you are not supposed to display anything in 1 ms.
try 20ms (50Hz), that is fine for the eyes.
why the first 10 indexes looks like this with space in the ms ?
03d
.........................
because you are not looking close enough !!!
posted Dec 24, 2024, 2:08 PM
Why on earth do I take time for all this ?
because you are not looking close enough !!!
True it was late night for me. I appreciate all your help and knowledge!