Udo Granulator

Am having an issue with gen~ and was wondering if someone could help out. 

Situation is that within a patcher abstraction I am trying to maintain a dynamic buffer name with the use of #0. Even though this already works for the buffer itself, I run into errors when including operations via gen~. The buffer itself is still referenceable from within the gen~ object, though I am not able to dynamically reference it in objects like dim or poke (as [dim #0] or [poke #0]).

Attached a simplified version of the issue.

Is there a way around this while remaining the operations in gen~?

Hi everyone!

Am having an issue with gen~ and was wondering if someone could help out. 

Situation is that within a patcher abstraction I...

dynamic-buffername-operations-within-unique-references-in-gen-as-dim-0-or-poke-0

Yes there is.  Although you can't use #0 etc. within a gen~ patcher, you can map a gen~ buffer to a Max buffer using an attribute (or by sending a message). 

 etc. as normal. If your dynamic named buffer is 

, then  on the gen~ object itself you can add a reference to it via 

 attribute tells gen~ that the gen~  buffer 

.  You can also acheive the same thing by sending a message to a gen~ object, e.g. the message 

Dynamic buffername operations within unique references in Gen~ (as [dim #0] or [poke #0])?