Efficient way to display a mix of video, image and 3D

vade is right.

On Nov 3, 2007, at 11:29 AM, vade wrote:

> draw pixels does not interpolate however, use a video plane with
> @transform_reset 2 and @automatic 0 or @layer. migrating to slab
> processing with that is easier too
>
> :)
> On Nov 3, 2007, at 11:04 AM, joshua goldberg wrote:
>
>> something like this?
>>
>> #P window setfont "Sans Serif" 9.;
>> #P window linecount 1;
>> #P comment 152 483 100 196617 step 3b;
>> #P window linecount 2;
>> #P newex 87 510 277 196617 jit.gl.gridshape bork @shape torus @name
>> shapey @texture cubetex @scale 0.1 0.1 0.1 @position -0.2 0.1 0
>> @automatic 0;
>> #P window linecount 1;
>> #P message 252 392 30 196617 read;
>> #P comment 299 416 100 196617 step 3a;
>> #P newex 228 414 63 196617 jit.qt.movie;
>> #P newex 228 439 164 196617 jit.gl.texture bork @name cubetex;
>> #P comment 472 390 100 196617 step 2;
>> #P window linecount 3;
>> #P newex 417 414 169 196617 jit.gl.gridshape bork @shape plane
>> @color 0. 0. 0. 0. @scale 0.7 0.7 0.7 @automatic 0;
>> #P window linecount 1;
>> #P message 178 115 30 196617 read;
>> #P newex 151 164 104 196617 prepend draw_pixels;
>> #P newex 151 138 107 196617 jit.qt.movie @adapt 1;
>> #P message 335 181 34 196617 reset;
>> #P newex 335 205 188 196617 jit.gl.handle bork @inherit_transform 1;
>> #P message 444 107 70 196617 fullscreen $1;
>> #P toggle 444 87 15 0;
>> #P newex 444 64 38 196617 sel 27;
>> #P newex 444 42 40 196617 key;
>> #P number 91 41 35 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 221 221 221 222 222 222 0 0 0;
>> #P user jit.fpsgui 28 274 60 196617 0;
>> #P newex 31 365 416 196617 t b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b;
>> #P newex 31 341 40 196617 r stuff;
>> #P toggle 31 47 15 0;
>> #P newex 60 130 40 196617 s stuff;
>> #P newex 28 249 201 196617 jit.gl.render bork @erase_color 0. 0. 0.
>> 1.;
>> #P newex 31 98 138 196617 t b b b;
>> #P newex 31 73 57 196617 qmetro 33;
>> #P newex 444 128 207 196617 jit.window bork @floating 1
>> @depthbuffer 1;
>> #P comment 267 137 100 196617 step 1;
>> #P connect 8 5 26 0;
>> #P connect 25 0 23 0;
>> #P connect 23 0 22 0;
>> #P connect 8 9 23 0;
>> #P connect 8 18 20 0;
>> #P connect 19 0 17 0;
>> #P connect 18 0 4 0;
>> #P connect 17 0 18 0;
>> #P connect 3 2 17 0;
>> #P connect 2 0 3 0;
>> #P connect 3 0 4 0;
>> #P connect 3 1 5 0;
>> #P connect 14 0 1 0;
>> #P connect 13 0 14 0;
>> #P connect 12 0 13 0;
>> #P connect 11 0 12 0;
>> #P connect 16 0 15 0;
>> #P connect 10 0 2 1;
>> #P connect 7 0 8 0;
>> #P connect 4 0 9 0;
>> #P connect 15 0 4 0;
>> #P connect 6 0 2 0;
>> #P window clipboard copycount 28;
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2007, at 10:47 AM, williamshome wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> What is your most efficient way to play with Max/Jitter to mix a
>>> number of video, image and sometimes 3D render ?
>>>
>>> For example, I am capturing a video and stretching it as the
>>> background. Now, I would like to add a static frame on top of it.
>>> Then a few images which can floating on top of it with 3D motions.
>>>
>>> The thing is BIG and have a resolution no less than 1600 x 1200.
>>>
>>> Way 1 : Go 3D
>>>
>>> I guess the most natural way is to have all the things up there be
>>> represented as jit.videoplane and then it is easy to manipulate.
>>>
>>> However, I am wondering if I am wasting resources on copying the
>>> captured video to texture memory constant, it is the background
>>> anyway.
>>>
>>> Way 2 : Go 2D
>>>
>>> OK. Jitter has all sort of method to bind video as matrix. So,
>>> what if we rendering the small clips into matrix and combine it ?
>>> Well, this method is very slow with the "to_texture" option.
>>>
>>> Way 3 : Go 2D + 3D
>>>
>>> Finally, is it possible to have the video and the static frame
>>> blended and draw as background; then render the small clips on top
>>> of the back-buffer? The method make sense, but I can't find a way
>>> to do it in max/jitter.
>>>
>>> What's your idea ?
>>>
>>> William
>>>
>>
>
>